Guilt Aversion and Ambiguity in the Battle of Sexes Game

We analyze the effects of guilt aversion in the Battle of Sexes game by exploiting the theory of psychological games and the concept of psychological Nash equilibrium. We then examine the impact of ambiguity in the (second-order) beliefs by taking into account the theory of psychological games under ambiguity. Our results show that the sensitivity to guilt affects the mixed strategy equilibrium of the game, as a player might be willing to accept a lower expected utility to compensate for the other player’s disutility from guilt. In turn, a pessimistic attitude towards ambiguity makes this effect more evident, as it makes the disutility from guilt greater.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13101607
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guilt Aversion and Ambiguity in the Battle of Sexes Game

Giuseppe De Marco, Alba Roviello, Maria Romaniello
Mathematics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Guilt Aversion and Ambiguity in the Battle of Sexes Game

Giuseppe De Marco, Alba Roviello, Maria Romaniello
article en

Abstract

We analyze the effects of guilt aversion in the Battle of Sexes game by exploiting the theory of psychological games and the concept of psychological Nash equilibrium. We then examine the impact of ambiguity in the (second-order) beliefs by taking into account the theory of psychological games under ambiguity. Our results show that the sensitivity to guilt affects the mixed strategy equilibrium of the game, as a player might be willing to accept a lower expected utility to compensate for the other player’s disutility from guilt. In turn, a pessimistic attitude towards ambiguity makes this effect more evident, as it makes the disutility from guilt greater.

MathematicsVol. 13(10)
Parthenope University of Naples (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.