Steps to Adapt the Medication Administration Error Survey in Highly Specialised Units—Polish Perspectives

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Medication errors are a critical issue in healthcare systems worldwide, contributing to significant patient harm, with studies indicating that medication-related incidents are among the most common causes of adverse events in medical practice. There are between 80 and 200 steps in providing a single patient with a single dose of drugs, with five stages, including prescription, preparation, dispensation, administration and monitoring. This study aims to describe and validate the MAEs (Medication Administration Error Scale) tool, which investigates the most common causes of medication errors in medication administration. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Independent translators translated the original version of the scale using language verification. The agreed-upon version of the translation was then assessed by a team of nurses, specialists in anaesthetic and intensive care nursing, in terms of understanding the translated content. After introducing changes resulting from linguistic and organisational differences, a survey questionnaire was prepared and used in the pilot study. Eighty-six respondents participated in the pilot study via the Office 365 platform and the Forms programme. The research was led by nurses who work in highly specialised units. The reliability of the translated version of the questionnaire was examined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. <b>Results</b>: The tool's internal consistency across ranges was within acceptable limits. For part A (questions 1-29), it was 0.93; for part B (questions 30-45), it was 0.94. In part C, regarding the percentages of the type of error occurring in a given medical facility, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97. When the factor loadings of the items were evaluated, they were determined to be in the range of 0.602-0.783. In this context, the factor loading levels of the items in the 5-factor model were high and sufficient. <b>Conclusions:</b> The statistical analyses suggest that the Polish version of the Medication Administration Error Survey demonstrates satisfactory reliability and is a promising tool for assessing the cause of medication administration errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15050173
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steps to Adapt the Medication Administration Error Survey in Highly Specialised Units—Polish Perspectives

Wioletta Mędrzycka‐Dąbrowska, Monika Kopeć, Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś
Nursing Reports
Healthcare Quality and Management
article

Steps to Adapt the Medication Administration Error Survey in Highly Specialised Units—Polish Perspectives

Wioletta Mędrzycka‐Dąbrowska, Monika Kopeć, Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Medication errors are a critical issue in healthcare systems worldwide, contributing to significant patient harm, with studies indicating that medication-related incidents are among the most common causes of adverse events in medical practice. There are between 80 and 200 steps in providing a single patient with a single dose of drugs, with five stages, including prescription, preparation, dispensation, administration and monitoring. This study aims to describe and validate the MAEs (Medication Administration Error Scale) tool, which investigates the most common causes of medication errors in medication administration. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Independent translators translated the original version of the scale using language verification. The agreed-upon version of the translation was then assessed by a team of nurses, specialists in anaesthetic and intensive care nursing, in terms of understanding the translated content. After introducing changes resulting from linguistic and organisational differences, a survey questionnaire was prepared and used in the pilot study. Eighty-six respondents participated in the pilot study via the Office 365 platform and the Forms programme. The research was led by nurses who work in highly specialised units. The reliability of the translated version of the questionnaire was examined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. <b>Results</b>: The tool's internal consistency across ranges was within acceptable limits. For part A (questions 1-29), it was 0.93; for part B (questions 30-45), it was 0.94. In part C, regarding the percentages of the type of error occurring in a given medical facility, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.97. When the factor loadings of the items were evaluated, they were determined to be in the range of 0.602-0.783. In this context, the factor loading levels of the items in the 5-factor model were high and sufficient. <b>Conclusions:</b> The statistical analyses suggest that the Polish version of the Medication Administration Error Survey demonstrates satisfactory reliability and is a promising tool for assessing the cause of medication administration errors.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(5)
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Healthcare Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.