¿Cómo rendimos en pandemia?: la influencia de la naturaleza del contenido y los pactos de colaboración en la evaluación en línea en una universidad chilena

The emergence of COVID-19 forced the change towards virtual education at all levels and implied a great challenge for traditional teaching and evaluation methodologies. This article statistically analyzes the performance of students at a Chilean public university before, during, and after confinement in theoretical-conceptual and logical-procedural subjects, specifically those taught between 2019 and 2022. Results show that, in online evaluations, students obtained higher grades and lower error and omission rates than in traditional evaluations; the logical-procedural subject obtained the lowest grades in both formats. It is argued that plagiarism or peer collaboration pacts are no guarantee of better performance, since their effectiveness is conditioned by the nature of the content, the characteristics of the evaluation instrument, and the quality of the knowledge distributed within the group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista CS
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i45.08
Primary Topic
E-Learning and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

¿Cómo rendimos en pandemia?: la influencia de la naturaleza del contenido y los pactos de colaboración en la evaluación en línea en una universidad chilena

Carlos Rodríguez Garcés, Denisse Espinosa Valenzuela, David Romero Garrido
Revista CS
E-Learning and Knowledge Management
article

¿Cómo rendimos en pandemia?: la influencia de la naturaleza del contenido y los pactos de colaboración en la evaluación en línea en una universidad chilena

Carlos Rodríguez Garcés, Denisse Espinosa Valenzuela, David Romero Garrido
article en

Abstract

The emergence of COVID-19 forced the change towards virtual education at all levels and implied a great challenge for traditional teaching and evaluation methodologies. This article statistically analyzes the performance of students at a Chilean public university before, during, and after confinement in theoretical-conceptual and logical-procedural subjects, specifically those taught between 2019 and 2022. Results show that, in online evaluations, students obtained higher grades and lower error and omission rates than in traditional evaluations; the logical-procedural subject obtained the lowest grades in both formats. It is argued that plagiarism or peer collaboration pacts are no guarantee of better performance, since their effectiveness is conditioned by the nature of the content, the characteristics of the evaluation instrument, and the quality of the knowledge distributed within the group.

Revista CS(45)
University of Bío-Bío (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
E-Learning and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

¿Cómo rendimos en pandemia?: la influencia de la naturaleza del contenido y los pactos de colaboración en la evaluación en línea en una universidad chilena — Carlos Rodríguez Garcés, Denisse Espinosa Valenzuela, et al. · Revista CS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS