Gelofusine as alternative to Dextran40‐based solution for washing cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell products prior to infusion: Validation and application to clinical practice

For 10 CBUs washed with Gelofusine, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 87%, 71%, and 75% respectively, higher than our reference values. In transplanted products, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 89%, 82%, and 91% respectively. Comparisons with Rubinstein solution revealed similar TNC and CD34<sup>+</sup> recovery but significantly higher TNC (89% vs. 68%) and CD34<sup>+</sup> (97% vs. 89%) viability with Gelofusine. Engraftment times for both solutions were similar. These findings support Gelofusine as an effective and valid alternative to Rubinstein-solution for washing cryopreserved HSCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfusion
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18272
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gelofusine as alternative to Dextran40‐based solution for washing cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell products prior to infusion: Validation and application to clinical practice

Peppino Mirabelli, Laura Auriemma, Maria Esposito, Giovanna Maisto et al.
Transfusion
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Gelofusine as alternative to Dextran40‐based solution for washing cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell products prior to infusion: Validation and application to clinical practice

Peppino Mirabelli, Laura Auriemma, Maria Esposito, Giovanna Maisto, Alessandra Picardi, Fabiana Cacace, Roberta Penta, Donato Madalese, Stefania Nappo, Mario Toriello, Francesco Paolo Tambaro, Francesco Topo, Lucia Gallo, Giovanni Castellano
article en

Abstract

For 10 CBUs washed with Gelofusine, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 87%, 71%, and 75% respectively, higher than our reference values. In transplanted products, CD34<sup>+</sup> and TNC viability and recovery were 96%, 89%, 82%, and 91% respectively. Comparisons with Rubinstein solution revealed similar TNC and CD34<sup>+</sup> recovery but significantly higher TNC (89% vs. 68%) and CD34<sup>+</sup> (97% vs. 89%) viability with Gelofusine. Engraftment times for both solutions were similar. These findings support Gelofusine as an effective and valid alternative to Rubinstein-solution for washing cryopreserved HSCs.

TransfusionVol. 65(6)
Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gelofusine as alternative to Dextran40‐based solution for washing cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell products prior to infusion: Validation and application to clinical practice — Peppino Mirabelli, Laura Auriemma, et al. · Transfusion (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS