Mind, Computation and the Incompleteness of the Formal System

Abstract The nature of mind and the relationship of mind to the current form of AI is one of the great and fundamental topics of contemporary philosophy and science. Is the human mind computational or not? Can the brain perform processes that no Turing machine can perform? Can the mind be simulated? Does the incompleteness of the formal system, or the undecidability of all formulas, mean the impossibility of intelligent behaviour? Is it a necessary condition of intelligence to answer all possible questions and tasks, and if so, what answers will be sufficient in the assessment? Only correct answers, or on the contrary, does “only correct” mean too precise and therefore infallible, thus again exclusively “inhuman”? The main aim of this study is to analyse Gödel’s answer to the question about the nature of mind, his metaphysical assumptions and its implications for the current debate on AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metaphysica
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2024-0044
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind, Computation and the Incompleteness of the Formal System

Thomas Hauer
Metaphysica
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

Mind, Computation and the Incompleteness of the Formal System

Thomas Hauer
article en

Abstract

Abstract The nature of mind and the relationship of mind to the current form of AI is one of the great and fundamental topics of contemporary philosophy and science. Is the human mind computational or not? Can the brain perform processes that no Turing machine can perform? Can the mind be simulated? Does the incompleteness of the formal system, or the undecidability of all formulas, mean the impossibility of intelligent behaviour? Is it a necessary condition of intelligence to answer all possible questions and tasks, and if so, what answers will be sufficient in the assessment? Only correct answers, or on the contrary, does “only correct” mean too precise and therefore infallible, thus again exclusively “inhuman”? The main aim of this study is to analyse Gödel’s answer to the question about the nature of mind, his metaphysical assumptions and its implications for the current debate on AI.

MetaphysicaVol. 26(2)
University of Trnava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.