Gender differences in paid work over time: Developments and challenges in comparative research

This paper examines gender differences in paid work over time and illustrates the pitfalls encountered by any comparative research that only considers either labor force participation rates or average working hours. To do so, we analyze harmonized survey data from Europe and the United States from 1992 to 2022 (N = 43,283,172) and show that more progress was made in closing gender gaps in labor force participation rates than in working hours. In most countries, women's labor force participation rates increased considerably, but their average working hours decreased, whereas both men's labor force participation rates and average working hours decreased or stagnated (but nonetheless still remained much higher than women's). We show and argue that these countervailing trends in working hours and labor force participation rates make it difficult to paint a coherent picture of cross-national differences in women's and men's paid work and of changes over time. In response, we propose "work volume" as a supplementary or alternative measure for any type of comparative research. Work volume records zero working hours for nonemployed individuals and thus allows straightforward comparisons between women's and men's (or any other groups') involvement in paid work. Using the proposed work volume measure, we show that gender gaps in paid work decreased over time, but that even in 2022, men's involvement in paid work remained considerably higher than women's-with gender gaps being lowest in the Scandinavian and the former Communist countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322871
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender differences in paid work over time: Developments and challenges in comparative research

Kristin Kelley, Lena Hipp
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Work-Family Balance Challenges
4.20
article

Gender differences in paid work over time: Developments and challenges in comparative research

Kristin Kelley, Lena Hipp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines gender differences in paid work over time and illustrates the pitfalls encountered by any comparative research that only considers either labor force participation rates or average working hours. To do so, we analyze harmonized survey data from Europe and the United States from 1992 to 2022 (N = 43,283,172) and show that more progress was made in closing gender gaps in labor force participation rates than in working hours. In most countries, women's labor force participation rates increased considerably, but their average working hours decreased, whereas both men's labor force participation rates and average working hours decreased or stagnated (but nonetheless still remained much higher than women's). We show and argue that these countervailing trends in working hours and labor force participation rates make it difficult to paint a coherent picture of cross-national differences in women's and men's paid work and of changes over time. In response, we propose "work volume" as a supplementary or alternative measure for any type of comparative research. Work volume records zero working hours for nonemployed individuals and thus allows straightforward comparisons between women's and men's (or any other groups') involvement in paid work. Using the proposed work volume measure, we show that gender gaps in paid work decreased over time, but that even in 2022, men's involvement in paid work remained considerably higher than women's-with gender gaps being lowest in the Scandinavian and the former Communist countries.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
University of Potsdam (DE), WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Hans Böckler Stiftung
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.