Dynamic Closed-Loop Validation of a Hardware-in-the-Loop Testbench for Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles

The complexity and shortening of development cycles in the automotive industry, particularly with the rise in hybrid electric vehicle sales, increases the need for efficient calibration and testing methods. Virtualization using hardware-in-the-loop testbenches has the potential to counteract these trends, specifically for the calibration of hybrid operating strategies. This paper presents a dynamic closed-loop validation of a hardware-in-the-loop testbench designed for the virtual calibration of hybrid operating strategies for a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Requirements regarding the hardware-in-the-loop testbench accuracy are defined based on the investigated use case. From this, a dedicated hardware-in-the-loop testbench setup is derived, including an electrical setup as well as a plant simulation model. The model is then operated in a closed loop with a series production hybrid control unit. The closed-loop validation results demonstrate that the chassis simulation reproduces driving resistance closely aligning with the reference data. The driver model follows target speed profiles within acceptable limits, achieving an R2 = 0.9993, comparable to the R2 reached by trained human drivers. The transmission model replicates the gear ratios, maintaining rotational speed deviations below 30 min−1. Furthermore, the shift strategy is implemented in a virtual control unit, resulting in a gear selection comparable to reference measurements. The energy flow simulation in the complete powertrain achieves high accuracy. Deviations in the high-voltage battery state of charge remain below 50 Wh in a WLTC charge-sustaining drive cycle and are thus within the acceptable error margin. The net energy change criterion is satisfied with the hardware-in-the-loop testbench, achieving a net energy change of 0.202%, closely matching the reference measurement of 0.159%. Maximum deviations in cumulative high-voltage battery energy are proven to be below 10% in both the charging and discharging directions. Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are modeled with deviations below 3%, validating the simulation’s representation of vehicle efficiency. Real-time capability is achieved under all investigated operating conditions and test scenarios. The testbench achieves a real-time factor of at least 1.104, ensuring execution within the hard real-time criterion. In conclusion, the closed-loop validation confirms that the developed hardware-in-the-loop testbench satisfies all predefined requirements, accurately simulating the behavior of the reference vehicle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16050273
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Real-time simulation and control systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Closed-Loop Validation of a Hardware-in-the-Loop Testbench for Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Sung-Yong Lee, Marc Düzgün, Sascha Krysmon, Christian Heusch et al.
2 citations
World Electric Vehicle Journal
Real-time simulation and control systems
2.43
article

Dynamic Closed-Loop Validation of a Hardware-in-the-Loop Testbench for Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Sung-Yong Lee, Marc Düzgün, Sascha Krysmon, Christian Heusch, Stefan Pischinger, Christian Dönitz, Jakob Andert
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The complexity and shortening of development cycles in the automotive industry, particularly with the rise in hybrid electric vehicle sales, increases the need for efficient calibration and testing methods. Virtualization using hardware-in-the-loop testbenches has the potential to counteract these trends, specifically for the calibration of hybrid operating strategies. This paper presents a dynamic closed-loop validation of a hardware-in-the-loop testbench designed for the virtual calibration of hybrid operating strategies for a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Requirements regarding the hardware-in-the-loop testbench accuracy are defined based on the investigated use case. From this, a dedicated hardware-in-the-loop testbench setup is derived, including an electrical setup as well as a plant simulation model. The model is then operated in a closed loop with a series production hybrid control unit. The closed-loop validation results demonstrate that the chassis simulation reproduces driving resistance closely aligning with the reference data. The driver model follows target speed profiles within acceptable limits, achieving an R2 = 0.9993, comparable to the R2 reached by trained human drivers. The transmission model replicates the gear ratios, maintaining rotational speed deviations below 30 min−1. Furthermore, the shift strategy is implemented in a virtual control unit, resulting in a gear selection comparable to reference measurements. The energy flow simulation in the complete powertrain achieves high accuracy. Deviations in the high-voltage battery state of charge remain below 50 Wh in a WLTC charge-sustaining drive cycle and are thus within the acceptable error margin. The net energy change criterion is satisfied with the hardware-in-the-loop testbench, achieving a net energy change of 0.202%, closely matching the reference measurement of 0.159%. Maximum deviations in cumulative high-voltage battery energy are proven to be below 10% in both the charging and discharging directions. Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are modeled with deviations below 3%, validating the simulation’s representation of vehicle efficiency. Real-time capability is achieved under all investigated operating conditions and test scenarios. The testbench achieves a real-time factor of at least 1.104, ensuring execution within the hard real-time criterion. In conclusion, the closed-loop validation confirms that the developed hardware-in-the-loop testbench satisfies all predefined requirements, accurately simulating the behavior of the reference vehicle.

World Electric Vehicle JournalVol. 16(5)
FEV (Germany) (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Real-time simulation and control systems
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.