The Fed Balance Sheet and Income Statement Losses: Why they Matter from a Political Economic Viewpoint

Abstract The US Federal Reserve has been incurring income statement losses since September 2022 and now operates in a state of negative net equity. The Fed has taken the position that the losses do not matter to monetary policy making and normal functioning. This paper sets out the reasons for the mounting losses and the Fed positioning in response, covering fundamental issues at stake, including interest paid on reserves to financial institutions, remittances and deferred assets. The analysis demonstrates that the scale and duration of the losses and the creditor relation with Treasury that has resulted pose a major challenge to Fed credibility and independence and raise questions regarding the financial and political sustainability of the Fed stance. Further, the paper presents evidence that the Fed has not been transparent with Congress or the public about the risks and costs of the QE and IOR/ONRRP regime. It suggests this non-transparency might be explained by a fear of loss of credibility that has extended and exacerbated the loss making. Finally, the analysis reveals a fiscal and political cost of Quantitative Easing (QE) that questions its possible use as policy response in future crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2024-0083
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Fed Balance Sheet and Income Statement Losses: Why they Matter from a Political Economic Viewpoint

John D. Feldmann
1 links
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

The Fed Balance Sheet and Income Statement Losses: Why they Matter from a Political Economic Viewpoint

John D. Feldmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract The US Federal Reserve has been incurring income statement losses since September 2022 and now operates in a state of negative net equity. The Fed has taken the position that the losses do not matter to monetary policy making and normal functioning. This paper sets out the reasons for the mounting losses and the Fed positioning in response, covering fundamental issues at stake, including interest paid on reserves to financial institutions, remittances and deferred assets. The analysis demonstrates that the scale and duration of the losses and the creditor relation with Treasury that has resulted pose a major challenge to Fed credibility and independence and raise questions regarding the financial and political sustainability of the Fed stance. Further, the paper presents evidence that the Fed has not been transparent with Congress or the public about the risks and costs of the QE and IOR/ONRRP regime. It suggests this non-transparency might be explained by a fear of loss of credibility that has extended and exacerbated the loss making. Finally, the analysis reveals a fiscal and political cost of Quantitative Easing (QE) that questions its possible use as policy response in future crises.

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Fed Balance Sheet and Income Statement Losses: Why they Matter from a Political Economic Viewpoint — John D. Feldmann · Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS