Work engagement measures: A systematic literature review

Most of the time, literature defines work engagement as a positive mental state characterized by the psychological presence at work and involving physical, emotional, and cognitive components. This systematic literature review aimed to identify instruments to measure engagement in the international context. We defined information sources, a search strategy, paper eligibility criteria, analysis criteria, and a data extraction process and present results. A total of 71 studies retrieved from online scientific databases were analyzed, including journal papers, book chapters, books, and manuals. We identified 25 Likert-type scales (of which 15 were analyzed) that differ from each other according to the perspective on work engagement. It is considered that, by pointing out a range of different psychometric scales as well as adjusting each one to four different theoretical perspectives, this paper may assist researchers in choosing the scale that is most aligned with their research objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universitas Psychologica
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy23.wems
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work engagement measures: A systematic literature review

Fernando César Almada Santos, Paula Maria Rattis Teixeira
1 citations
Universitas Psychologica
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
0.67
article

Work engagement measures: A systematic literature review

Fernando César Almada Santos, Paula Maria Rattis Teixeira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Most of the time, literature defines work engagement as a positive mental state characterized by the psychological presence at work and involving physical, emotional, and cognitive components. This systematic literature review aimed to identify instruments to measure engagement in the international context. We defined information sources, a search strategy, paper eligibility criteria, analysis criteria, and a data extraction process and present results. A total of 71 studies retrieved from online scientific databases were analyzed, including journal papers, book chapters, books, and manuals. We identified 25 Likert-type scales (of which 15 were analyzed) that differ from each other according to the perspective on work engagement. It is considered that, by pointing out a range of different psychometric scales as well as adjusting each one to four different theoretical perspectives, this paper may assist researchers in choosing the scale that is most aligned with their research objectives.

Universitas PsychologicaVol. 23
Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.