From Manual to Automated Driving: Understanding the Shift in Driver Headway Preferences

A common feature in Automated Vehicles (AVs) at different levels of automation is Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC), which helps drivers to choose their desired headway to a preceding vehicle from pre-defined options, improving comfort and traffic efficiency. However, the acceptance and use of ACC depend on how well these options align with users’ expectations with different driving styles. Therefore, using a driving simulator and recruiting 28 participants, this study aimed to examine how the driver’s headway preferences differ from their manual driving behaviour considering their personal driving styles and to identify the factors that shape this deviation. Additionally, the discrepancy between the available headway settings and the preferences of drivers and its impact on trust and perceived safety of users were explored. The participants experienced three scenarios, in the first they drove manually, in the second they defined their preferred time headway, and in the third they selected a desired headway setting from three available options. The results showed that drivers, in general, prefer a larger headway for ACC compared to their manual driving, although this preference depends on their personal driving styles. Along with the “dissociative” self-reported driving style, average manual time headway and conscientiousness personality trait affect the difference between drivers’ manual and preferred time headway. The study found that while exposure to ACC increases trust in AVs, perceived safety decreases if headway settings do not match drivers’ preferences, discouraging AVs use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.04.084
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Manual to Automated Driving: Understanding the Shift in Driver Headway Preferences

Riccardo Rossi, Federico Orsini, Massimiliano Gastaldi, Masoud Saljoqi
4 citations
Transportation research procedia
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
9.75
article

From Manual to Automated Driving: Understanding the Shift in Driver Headway Preferences

Riccardo Rossi, Federico Orsini, Massimiliano Gastaldi, Masoud Saljoqi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A common feature in Automated Vehicles (AVs) at different levels of automation is Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC), which helps drivers to choose their desired headway to a preceding vehicle from pre-defined options, improving comfort and traffic efficiency. However, the acceptance and use of ACC depend on how well these options align with users’ expectations with different driving styles. Therefore, using a driving simulator and recruiting 28 participants, this study aimed to examine how the driver’s headway preferences differ from their manual driving behaviour considering their personal driving styles and to identify the factors that shape this deviation. Additionally, the discrepancy between the available headway settings and the preferences of drivers and its impact on trust and perceived safety of users were explored. The participants experienced three scenarios, in the first they drove manually, in the second they defined their preferred time headway, and in the third they selected a desired headway setting from three available options. The results showed that drivers, in general, prefer a larger headway for ACC compared to their manual driving, although this preference depends on their personal driving styles. Along with the “dissociative” self-reported driving style, average manual time headway and conscientiousness personality trait affect the difference between drivers’ manual and preferred time headway. The study found that while exposure to ACC increases trust in AVs, perceived safety decreases if headway settings do not match drivers’ preferences, discouraging AVs use.

Transportation research procediaVol. 86
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.