Addressing major issues regarding the roles of biodosimetry in responding to a major nuclear incident: report of EPR BioDose 2024 roundtable discussion

The roundtable discussion at EPR BioDose 2024 focused on identifying challenges for using biodosimetry in a large nuclear incident and exploring potential solutions to strengthen preparedness and response frameworks. This report outlines the major themes discussed, including advancements in techniques, challenges in scaling operations, and the future of biodosimetry in emergency response. Initiated by International Association of Biological and EPR Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD), a group of experts comprised of professionals in academia, government and other agencies, were asked to discuss the question: 'When and how should biodosimetry be used for an unplanned radiation explosion in the short or long term?' This question challenged participants to consider a range of scenarios, from immediate triage in the aftermath of an incident to long-term health monitoring and risk assessment. Panelists acknowledged that, while biodosimetry plays a crucial role in rapidly assessing exposure levels to guide medical response, its practical implementation can vary based on scale, resources, and timing. They emphasized that in the short term, methods that provide quick, large-scale screening are important, whereas long-term strategies might include more detailed biological assessments to understand cumulative effects and potential health risks. Despite the difficulty of a one-size-fits-all approach, the insights gathered aimed to inform strategies that balance speed, accuracy, and sustainability in biodosimetry practices. Finally, panelists emphasized the need for better communication about preparedness with the general public and healthcare providers, and a more collaborative approach that also takes into account evaluating the practicality of various methods for triage or guiding treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Radiation Biology
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2025.2498978
Primary Topic
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing major issues regarding the roles of biodosimetry in responding to a major nuclear incident: report of EPR BioDose 2024 roundtable discussion

Valerie Swee Ting Goh, Ruth C. Wilkins, Donovan Anderson, Matthias Port et al.
International Journal of Radiation Biology
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
article

Addressing major issues regarding the roles of biodosimetry in responding to a major nuclear incident: report of EPR BioDose 2024 roundtable discussion

Valerie Swee Ting Goh, Ruth C. Wilkins, Donovan Anderson, Matthias Port, Ann Barry Flood, Harold M. Swartz, Naduparambil K. Jacob, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Mattia Romeo
article en

Abstract

The roundtable discussion at EPR BioDose 2024 focused on identifying challenges for using biodosimetry in a large nuclear incident and exploring potential solutions to strengthen preparedness and response frameworks. This report outlines the major themes discussed, including advancements in techniques, challenges in scaling operations, and the future of biodosimetry in emergency response. Initiated by International Association of Biological and EPR Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD), a group of experts comprised of professionals in academia, government and other agencies, were asked to discuss the question: 'When and how should biodosimetry be used for an unplanned radiation explosion in the short or long term?' This question challenged participants to consider a range of scenarios, from immediate triage in the aftermath of an incident to long-term health monitoring and risk assessment. Panelists acknowledged that, while biodosimetry plays a crucial role in rapidly assessing exposure levels to guide medical response, its practical implementation can vary based on scale, resources, and timing. They emphasized that in the short term, methods that provide quick, large-scale screening are important, whereas long-term strategies might include more detailed biological assessments to understand cumulative effects and potential health risks. Despite the difficulty of a one-size-fits-all approach, the insights gathered aimed to inform strategies that balance speed, accuracy, and sustainability in biodosimetry practices. Finally, panelists emphasized the need for better communication about preparedness with the general public and healthcare providers, and a more collaborative approach that also takes into account evaluating the practicality of various methods for triage or guiding treatment.

International Journal of Radiation Biology
Dartmouth College (US), Health Canada (CA), National Institutes of Health (US), Hirosaki University (JP), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT), National University of Singapore (SG), Universität Ulm (DE), The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US), Government of Canada (CA), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), University of Palermo (IT)
National Research Foundation Singapore, Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.