Response to Donald et al., (2025)

Donald et al. (2025) misinterpret the central premise of the paper, incorrectly stating that we argue “carbon credit claims […] for increased sequestered carbon from early measurements are based on increases related to favourable climatic variations rather than improved land management”. At no point in our paper do we make this claim. Instead, our analysis concluded that “SOC stocks were primarily driven by rainfall,” while also acknowledging the role of improved land management in SOC dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Management
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2484503
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response to Donald et al., (2025)

Elaine Mitchell, Felicity Deane, Susan Orgill, Annette Cowie et al.
Carbon Management
Forest Management and Policy
article

Response to Donald et al., (2025)

Elaine Mitchell, Felicity Deane, Susan Orgill, Annette Cowie, David Rowlings, Aaron Simmons, Laura A. Grace, Brian Wilson, Sahar Ahmadi, Warwick Badgery, Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel, David J. Pannell, Matthew Tom Harrison, Naoya Takeda, Richard Eckard, William J. Parton, Paige L. Stanley, Peter Grace, Ken Day
article en

Abstract

Donald et al. (2025) misinterpret the central premise of the paper, incorrectly stating that we argue “carbon credit claims […] for increased sequestered carbon from early measurements are based on increases related to favourable climatic variations rather than improved land management”. At no point in our paper do we make this claim. Instead, our analysis concluded that “SOC stocks were primarily driven by rainfall,” while also acknowledging the role of improved land management in SOC dynamics.

Carbon ManagementVol. 16(1)
University of Tasmania (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU), University of New England (US), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Carbon180 (US), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.