Robust Retrieval of Slope-Parallel Landslide Displacements From Single-Track InSAR Observations: A Line of Sight (LOS) Sensitivity Correction Framework

Landslides in mountainous regions exhibit widespread distribution and high recurrence, posing critical threats to human safety and socioeconomic assets. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) has proven instrumental in landslide identification, continuous monitoring, and early-warning systems. Nevertheless, the inherent side-looking geometry of SAR systems restricts displacement measurements to the line-of-sight (LOS) direction, which may misrepresent true slope-parallel displacement and cause substantial inconsistencies between ascending/descending track-derived results and actual ground movement. To address this limitation, this study introduces the concept of LOS sensitivity (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LS</i>) and systematically quantifies geometric distortion effects on LOS measurements across diverse slope gradients and aspects. We propose an innovative LOS Sensitivity Correction (LSC) framework that integrates geometric distortion correction through joint optimization of topographic parameters and SAR interferometric processing configurations, enabling precise retrieval of slope-parallel displacement from single-track InSAR observations. Validation experiments utilizing Sentinel-1 ascending/descending datasets over the Ermulin and Huanglianping landslides demonstrate that while conventional D-InSAR results exhibit significant inter-track discrepancies (exceeding 40 mm in magnitude), LSC-processed displacements achieve remarkable consistency in deformation patterns (correlation coefficient >0.92) and spatial distribution. We further analyzed the influence of topographic parameters and interferometric processing configurations on LSC, revealing their effects on the correction results. The proposed methodology comprehensively resolves LOS sensitivity challenges for slopes with arbitrary geometries, advancing the fundamental understanding of terrain-dependent SAR detection limitations while transcending the simplistic formulaic application of conventional correction frameworks. This work establishes a paradigm for robust interpretation of slope-parallel kinematics from single-track InSAR products, with direct implications for landslide hazard assessment and mitigation strategies in complex terrains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2025.3570129
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust Retrieval of Slope-Parallel Landslide Displacements From Single-Track InSAR Observations: A Line of Sight (LOS) Sensitivity Correction Framework

Ningling Wen, Yakun Han, Guanchen Zhuo, Qiang Xu et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Landslides and related hazards
7.27
article

Robust Retrieval of Slope-Parallel Landslide Displacements From Single-Track InSAR Observations: A Line of Sight (LOS) Sensitivity Correction Framework

Ningling Wen, Yakun Han, Guanchen Zhuo, Qiang Xu, Jin Gen Deng, Keren Dai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Landslides in mountainous regions exhibit widespread distribution and high recurrence, posing critical threats to human safety and socioeconomic assets. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) has proven instrumental in landslide identification, continuous monitoring, and early-warning systems. Nevertheless, the inherent side-looking geometry of SAR systems restricts displacement measurements to the line-of-sight (LOS) direction, which may misrepresent true slope-parallel displacement and cause substantial inconsistencies between ascending/descending track-derived results and actual ground movement. To address this limitation, this study introduces the concept of LOS sensitivity (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LS</i>) and systematically quantifies geometric distortion effects on LOS measurements across diverse slope gradients and aspects. We propose an innovative LOS Sensitivity Correction (LSC) framework that integrates geometric distortion correction through joint optimization of topographic parameters and SAR interferometric processing configurations, enabling precise retrieval of slope-parallel displacement from single-track InSAR observations. Validation experiments utilizing Sentinel-1 ascending/descending datasets over the Ermulin and Huanglianping landslides demonstrate that while conventional D-InSAR results exhibit significant inter-track discrepancies (exceeding 40 mm in magnitude), LSC-processed displacements achieve remarkable consistency in deformation patterns (correlation coefficient >0.92) and spatial distribution. We further analyzed the influence of topographic parameters and interferometric processing configurations on LSC, revealing their effects on the correction results. The proposed methodology comprehensively resolves LOS sensitivity challenges for slopes with arbitrary geometries, advancing the fundamental understanding of terrain-dependent SAR detection limitations while transcending the simplistic formulaic application of conventional correction frameworks. This work establishes a paradigm for robust interpretation of slope-parallel kinematics from single-track InSAR products, with direct implications for landslide hazard assessment and mitigation strategies in complex terrains.

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingVol. 63
Chengdu University of Technology (CN), State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Landslides and related hazards
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.