Using Machine Learning to Prioritize Forensic Artifacts in Email Evidence

This paper addresses one of the challenges of digital forensics by enhancing the analysis phase, focusing on prioritizing forensic artifacts in email evidence using machine learning. The urgency stems from the growing volume and variety of digital evidence, leading to backlogs in forensic laboratories. The research explores how categorizing forensic artifacts by priority can optimize the criminal investigation. The study develops and evaluates three machine learning models: Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Fully Connected Neural Network (FCNN). These models are assessed based on their accuracy, strengths, limitations, and ability to prioritize email evidence. Results indicate that the SVM model is the most accurate and consistently performing well, while the FCNN model uniquely classifies all validation set emails correctly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icoin63865.2025.10993177
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Machine Learning to Prioritize Forensic Artifacts in Email Evidence

Mohammed AbuJarour, Verena V. Hafner, Raad Bin Tareaf
1 citations
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
article

Using Machine Learning to Prioritize Forensic Artifacts in Email Evidence

Mohammed AbuJarour, Verena V. Hafner, Raad Bin Tareaf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses one of the challenges of digital forensics by enhancing the analysis phase, focusing on prioritizing forensic artifacts in email evidence using machine learning. The urgency stems from the growing volume and variety of digital evidence, leading to backlogs in forensic laboratories. The research explores how categorizing forensic artifacts by priority can optimize the criminal investigation. The study develops and evaluates three machine learning models: Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Fully Connected Neural Network (FCNN). These models are assessed based on their accuracy, strengths, limitations, and ability to prioritize email evidence. Results indicate that the SVM model is the most accurate and consistently performing well, while the FCNN model uniquely classifies all validation set emails correctly.

University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Machine Learning to Prioritize Forensic Artifacts in Email Evidence — Mohammed AbuJarour, Verena V. Hafner, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS