Explaining SAR ATR Models Predictions with Counterfactual Explanations

In recent years, Deep Learning models have become more and more popular and their performance have been tested on several domains, from medical to military applications. While being particularly competitive, their non-transparency nature raise plentiful questions, in particular in critical applications for which it seems self-evident to have more insight on models. To alleviate this issue, the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence field has emerged in order to propound more understandable models and consequently to make them more trustworthy. Yet, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images and especially for Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) is still an emerging subject. In this paper, we investigate the potential of counterfactual explanations to explain ATR model decisions. Not only do we detail the method that we used to generate counterfactual explanations, but we also illustrate how we exploit them to provide semi-global explanations. Thanks to the well-known MSTAR dataset, we effectively show that this approach can unveil how the model imagines a class against another and, more generally, improve the comprehension of the ATR model reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/radar58436.2024.10994132
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining SAR ATR Models Predictions with Counterfactual Explanations

Jean‐Marc Le Caillec, Jacques Petit-Frère, Jean-Yves Schneider, Héloïse Remusati et al.
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Explaining SAR ATR Models Predictions with Counterfactual Explanations

Jean‐Marc Le Caillec, Jacques Petit-Frère, Jean-Yves Schneider, Héloïse Remusati, Thomas Merlet
article en

Abstract

In recent years, Deep Learning models have become more and more popular and their performance have been tested on several domains, from medical to military applications. While being particularly competitive, their non-transparency nature raise plentiful questions, in particular in critical applications for which it seems self-evident to have more insight on models. To alleviate this issue, the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence field has emerged in order to propound more understandable models and consequently to make them more trustworthy. Yet, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images and especially for Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) is still an emerging subject. In this paper, we investigate the potential of counterfactual explanations to explain ATR model decisions. Not only do we detail the method that we used to generate counterfactual explanations, but we also illustrate how we exploit them to provide semi-global explanations. Thanks to the well-known MSTAR dataset, we effectively show that this approach can unveil how the model imagines a class against another and, more generally, improve the comprehension of the ATR model reasoning.

Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), IMT Atlantique (FR), Thales (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.