Global disparities in indoor wildfire-PM <sub>2.5</sub> exposure and mitigation costs

Wildfires have become more frequent and severe, and evidence showed that exposure to wildfire-caused PM<sub>2.5</sub> (fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is associated with adverse health effects. Fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure occurs mainly indoors, where people spend most of their time. As an effective and timely approach of mitigating indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution, air purifiers incur notable associated costs. However, the long-term global population exposure to indoor fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the economic burden of using air purifiers remain unknown. Here, we estimated the indoor fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration and the cost of reducing indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, along with the extra cost incurred because of fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub>, at a resolution of 0.5° by 0.5° globally during 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed 1009 million individuals exposed to at least one substantial indoor wildfire-air pollution day per year. We identified pronounced socioeconomic disparities in the costs of mitigating indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, with low-income countries bearing a disproportionately higher economic burden, emphasizing the critical need for addressing these disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ads4360
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global disparities in indoor wildfire-PM 2.5 exposure and mitigation costs

Dongjia Han, Jianghao Wang, Bin Zhao, Yongxuan Guo
13 citations
Science Advances
Fire effects on ecosystems
14.37
article

Global disparities in indoor wildfire-PM 2.5 exposure and mitigation costs

Dongjia Han, Jianghao Wang, Bin Zhao, Yongxuan Guo
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Wildfires have become more frequent and severe, and evidence showed that exposure to wildfire-caused PM<sub>2.5</sub> (fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is associated with adverse health effects. Fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure occurs mainly indoors, where people spend most of their time. As an effective and timely approach of mitigating indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution, air purifiers incur notable associated costs. However, the long-term global population exposure to indoor fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the economic burden of using air purifiers remain unknown. Here, we estimated the indoor fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration and the cost of reducing indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, along with the extra cost incurred because of fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub>, at a resolution of 0.5° by 0.5° globally during 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed 1009 million individuals exposed to at least one substantial indoor wildfire-air pollution day per year. We identified pronounced socioeconomic disparities in the costs of mitigating indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, with low-income countries bearing a disproportionately higher economic burden, emphasizing the critical need for addressing these disparities.

Science AdvancesVol. 11(20)
Urban Institute (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Fire effects on ecosystems
14.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.