Building momentum: A computational account of persistence toward long-term goals

Extended goals necessitate extended commitment. We address how humans select between multiple goals in a temporally extended setting. We probe whether humans engage in prospective valuation of goals by estimating which goals are likely to yield future success and choosing those, or whether they rely on a less optimal retrospective strategy, favoring goals with greater accumulated progress even if less likely to result in success. To address this, we introduce a novel task in which goals need to be persistently selected until a set target is reached to earn an overall reward. In a series of experiments, we show that human goal selection involves a mix of prospective and retrospective influences, with an undue bias in favor of retrospective valuation. We show that a goal valuation model utilizing the concept of 'momentum', where progress accrued toward a goal builds value and persists across trials, successfully explains human behavior better than alternative frameworks. Our findings thus suggest an important role for momentum in explaining the valuation process underpinning human goal selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013054
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building momentum: A computational account of persistence toward long-term goals

John P. O’Doherty, Sneha Aenugu
4 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
9.08
article

Building momentum: A computational account of persistence toward long-term goals

John P. O’Doherty, Sneha Aenugu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Extended goals necessitate extended commitment. We address how humans select between multiple goals in a temporally extended setting. We probe whether humans engage in prospective valuation of goals by estimating which goals are likely to yield future success and choosing those, or whether they rely on a less optimal retrospective strategy, favoring goals with greater accumulated progress even if less likely to result in success. To address this, we introduce a novel task in which goals need to be persistently selected until a set target is reached to earn an overall reward. In a series of experiments, we show that human goal selection involves a mix of prospective and retrospective influences, with an undue bias in favor of retrospective valuation. We show that a goal valuation model utilizing the concept of 'momentum', where progress accrued toward a goal builds value and persists across trials, successfully explains human behavior better than alternative frameworks. Our findings thus suggest an important role for momentum in explaining the valuation process underpinning human goal selection.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 21(5)
California Institute of Technology (US)
Army Research Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.