The perceptions of farmers toward fee-based extension programs and services

This study used a descriptive survey design to explain U.S. agricultural producers' perceptions of how fee-based services would limit their access to Extension resources. Agricultural producers in the United States use Extension because of the free resources, troubleshooting, and competitively priced and high-quality lab services. Participants perceived immense value in research-based information available at no cost, especially for those who fell into the lower gross farm income brackets. Participants with higher-income farms were more tolerant of paying for commercial consulting services, likely due to having more capital to invest in such services. Despite their aversion to fees, participants supported paying for lab services that evaluated soil, plant, water, and feed samples. Such fees are expected as part of a standard business transaction yielding a tangible product or data, as one would experience when buying other goods. Participants were largely unaware of free commercial plant disease diagnosis services, which suggests an opportunity for agricultural agents to promote this more thoroughly in their counties. Overall, Georgia agricultural producers rely on Extension for free or affordable information that is high-quality and readily accessible. Producers count on their county agent to link them to a resource system providing valuable information in numerous formats to meet their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advancements in Agricultural Development
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v6i2.571
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The perceptions of farmers toward fee-based extension programs and services

Robyn Stewart, D. Barry Croom, Peter J. Burke, Shanna Reynolds et al.
Advancements in Agricultural Development
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

The perceptions of farmers toward fee-based extension programs and services

Robyn Stewart, D. Barry Croom, Peter J. Burke, Shanna Reynolds, Kimberly K. Post, John Rayfield, B. Wassel, Zackary Williams, Joshua G. Fuder
article en

Abstract

This study used a descriptive survey design to explain U.S. agricultural producers' perceptions of how fee-based services would limit their access to Extension resources. Agricultural producers in the United States use Extension because of the free resources, troubleshooting, and competitively priced and high-quality lab services. Participants perceived immense value in research-based information available at no cost, especially for those who fell into the lower gross farm income brackets. Participants with higher-income farms were more tolerant of paying for commercial consulting services, likely due to having more capital to invest in such services. Despite their aversion to fees, participants supported paying for lab services that evaluated soil, plant, water, and feed samples. Such fees are expected as part of a standard business transaction yielding a tangible product or data, as one would experience when buying other goods. Participants were largely unaware of free commercial plant disease diagnosis services, which suggests an opportunity for agricultural agents to promote this more thoroughly in their counties. Overall, Georgia agricultural producers rely on Extension for free or affordable information that is high-quality and readily accessible. Producers count on their county agent to link them to a resource system providing valuable information in numerous formats to meet their needs.

Advancements in Agricultural DevelopmentVol. 6(2)
Texas Tech University (US), University of Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.