Economical production of critical culture media for self-sufficient quality control in a public pharmaceutical industry

Introduction:In the pharmaceutical industry, microbiological control is essential to ensure product safety and efficacy.The use of culture media enables the identification and analysis of microorganisms, thereby enabling the assessment of their distinct characteristics.However, reliance on external suppliers poses challenges, such as substantial costs and quality inconsistencies in inputs.In-house production is a strategic alternative, providing cost reduction, improved reliability, and optimized quality control.Objectives: Evaluate the economic viability of in-house production of critical culture media to cut costs and achieve self-sufficiency. Methodology:A comparative analysis of the purchasing and in-house production costs of three culture media (A, B, and C) was performed over the past three years.Direct costs were estimated using the semiabsolute costing method, which accounts exclusively for inputs and labor, excluding indirect expenses.In addition to the economic evaluation, an operational viability assessment was conducted, considering infrastructure availability, staff training, and regulatory compliance.Furthermore, production quality was examined by comparing failure rates between in-house and commercially acquired batches to determine their impact on process reliability. Results:The implementation of in-house production methods resulted in an average 47% reduction in direct costs, representing only 5.3% of the aggregate production of culture media.Medium B exhibited a 32% reduction, and this was the only medium that demonstrated failures with a 50% rejection rate in purchased batches.Conversely, batches produced in-house exhibited a 3.1% failure rate.Medium C achieved a 47% reduction in costs, while Medium D attained a 49% reduction.In addition to reducing costs, in-house production has demonstrated improved test reliability, reduced failures, and optimized processes. Conclusion:The economic and technical viability of in-house production of critical culture media has led to cost savings and improved quality control.The decline in the failure rate of Medium B (from 50% to 3.1%) reinforces test reliability, ensuring sterility and standardization.In addition, the internalization of production processes enhances sustainability by cutting transport, CO 2 emissions, and packaging waste.Finally, the strategic adoption of internalization is a sustainable solution that fosters independence from external suppliers, optimizes logistics, and reduces indirect costs for the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35259/isi.2025_70078
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economical production of critical culture media for self-sufficient quality control in a public pharmaceutical industry

Marco Santos, Gevaldo L. de Almeida, Andreia Bento‐Silva, Paulo Miranda et al.
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Economical production of critical culture media for self-sufficient quality control in a public pharmaceutical industry

Marco Santos, Gevaldo L. de Almeida, Andreia Bento‐Silva, Paulo Miranda, Mariana Lopes Borges, Greice Maria Silva da Conceição, Rodrigo Silva, Ana Silva, Leandro Lomar
article en

Abstract

Introduction:In the pharmaceutical industry, microbiological control is essential to ensure product safety and efficacy.The use of culture media enables the identification and analysis of microorganisms, thereby enabling the assessment of their distinct characteristics.However, reliance on external suppliers poses challenges, such as substantial costs and quality inconsistencies in inputs.In-house production is a strategic alternative, providing cost reduction, improved reliability, and optimized quality control.Objectives: Evaluate the economic viability of in-house production of critical culture media to cut costs and achieve self-sufficiency. Methodology:A comparative analysis of the purchasing and in-house production costs of three culture media (A, B, and C) was performed over the past three years.Direct costs were estimated using the semiabsolute costing method, which accounts exclusively for inputs and labor, excluding indirect expenses.In addition to the economic evaluation, an operational viability assessment was conducted, considering infrastructure availability, staff training, and regulatory compliance.Furthermore, production quality was examined by comparing failure rates between in-house and commercially acquired batches to determine their impact on process reliability. Results:The implementation of in-house production methods resulted in an average 47% reduction in direct costs, representing only 5.3% of the aggregate production of culture media.Medium B exhibited a 32% reduction, and this was the only medium that demonstrated failures with a 50% rejection rate in purchased batches.Conversely, batches produced in-house exhibited a 3.1% failure rate.Medium C achieved a 47% reduction in costs, while Medium D attained a 49% reduction.In addition to reducing costs, in-house production has demonstrated improved test reliability, reduced failures, and optimized processes. Conclusion:The economic and technical viability of in-house production of critical culture media has led to cost savings and improved quality control.The decline in the failure rate of Medium B (from 50% to 3.1%) reinforces test reliability, ensuring sterility and standardization.In addition, the internalization of production processes enhances sustainability by cutting transport, CO 2 emissions, and packaging waste.Finally, the strategic adoption of internalization is a sustainable solution that fosters independence from external suppliers, optimizes logistics, and reduces indirect costs for the pharmaceutical industry.

Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.