Life cycle assessment of camelina and spelt wheat in organic intercropping systems

Camelina sativa (L. Crantz) is an annual oilseed crop cultivated for industrial and food purposes. To expand camelina's cultivation area, improve yields, and reduce weed pressure, the crop can be grown in intercropping system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of camelina cultivation in an intercropping system with spelt wheat under organic farming with utilisation of life cycle assessment (LCA). A life cycle assessment for sole cultivation of camelina and spelt was also performed. The system boundary included crop production up to the farm gate, taking into account field emissions and soil organic carbon changes. Due to nearly identical production inputs across all three cropping systems, the environmental impact was similar across all impact categories, with a more noticeable contribution from electricity usage in the intercropping system. Sole camelina cultivation showed a higher impact in 13 impact categories (per 1 Mg functional unit). However, when calculated per 1 GJ, the intercropping system exhibited the highest environmental impact across all categories. Moreover, intercropping resulted in the highest emissions per hectare in the following categories: global warming (860 kg CO₂ eq.), freshwater eutrophication (0.34 kg P eq.), and terrestrial ecotoxicity (2936 kg 1,4-DCB eq.). Our results indicates that intercropping did not reduce the environmental impact compared with sole cropping systems, primarily due to low seed and energy yields per hectare. Nevertheless, the findings demonstrate that both organic intercropping and sole cropping systems have a lower environmental impact than conventional farming systems. • The study presents the first life cycle assessment of camelina intercropping. • Camelina intercropping led to the highest emissions per hectare an per 1GJ. • Field emissions and electricity use had high impact in the intercropping system. • Intercropping had higher environmental impact compared with sole cropping. • Our results are better than for camelina in the conventional farming system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Crops and Products
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121198
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of camelina and spelt wheat in organic intercropping systems

Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, Ewelina Olba–Zięty, Michał Krzyżaniak, Kazimierz Warmiński et al.
3 citations
Industrial Crops and Products
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
5.71
article

Life cycle assessment of camelina and spelt wheat in organic intercropping systems

Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, Ewelina Olba–Zięty, Michał Krzyżaniak, Kazimierz Warmiński, Przemysław Białoskórski
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Camelina sativa (L. Crantz) is an annual oilseed crop cultivated for industrial and food purposes. To expand camelina's cultivation area, improve yields, and reduce weed pressure, the crop can be grown in intercropping system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of camelina cultivation in an intercropping system with spelt wheat under organic farming with utilisation of life cycle assessment (LCA). A life cycle assessment for sole cultivation of camelina and spelt was also performed. The system boundary included crop production up to the farm gate, taking into account field emissions and soil organic carbon changes. Due to nearly identical production inputs across all three cropping systems, the environmental impact was similar across all impact categories, with a more noticeable contribution from electricity usage in the intercropping system. Sole camelina cultivation showed a higher impact in 13 impact categories (per 1 Mg functional unit). However, when calculated per 1 GJ, the intercropping system exhibited the highest environmental impact across all categories. Moreover, intercropping resulted in the highest emissions per hectare in the following categories: global warming (860 kg CO₂ eq.), freshwater eutrophication (0.34 kg P eq.), and terrestrial ecotoxicity (2936 kg 1,4-DCB eq.). Our results indicates that intercropping did not reduce the environmental impact compared with sole cropping systems, primarily due to low seed and energy yields per hectare. Nevertheless, the findings demonstrate that both organic intercropping and sole cropping systems have a lower environmental impact than conventional farming systems. • The study presents the first life cycle assessment of camelina intercropping. • Camelina intercropping led to the highest emissions per hectare an per 1GJ. • Field emissions and electricity use had high impact in the intercropping system. • Intercropping had higher environmental impact compared with sole cropping. • Our results are better than for camelina in the conventional farming system.

Industrial Crops and ProductsVol. 231
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
5.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.