CRITICAL THINKING AND SOCIAL NORMS AS BUFFERS AGAINST HATE SPEECH ACCEPTANCE

This study investigates the relationship between attitudes toward hate language and demographic, cognitive, and social factors among 250 individuals from Tbilisi, Georgia, and its regions.Using a face-to-face survey methodology, participants completed three measures: The Comprehensive Thinking Style Questionnaire (CTSQ), Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM), and a Hate Language Scale.The results indicated significant gender differences, with women showing stronger disagreement with hate language.Education level was inversely correlated with tolerance for ageism, while thinking styles revealed that closed-mindedness positively correlated with acceptance of hate language, whereas open-minded and effortful thinking negatively correlated.Social comparison of opinions was associated with lower tolerance for direct hate language, reflecting the influence of societal norms.These findings highlight the protective role of education, cognitive openness, and social comparison in reducing prejudice and have practical implications for designing interventions aimed at mitigating hate language.

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36315/2025inpact129
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRITICAL THINKING AND SOCIAL NORMS AS BUFFERS AGAINST HATE SPEECH ACCEPTANCE

Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

CRITICAL THINKING AND SOCIAL NORMS AS BUFFERS AGAINST HATE SPEECH ACCEPTANCE

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between attitudes toward hate language and demographic, cognitive, and social factors among 250 individuals from Tbilisi, Georgia, and its regions.Using a face-to-face survey methodology, participants completed three measures: The Comprehensive Thinking Style Questionnaire (CTSQ), Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM), and a Hate Language Scale.The results indicated significant gender differences, with women showing stronger disagreement with hate language.Education level was inversely correlated with tolerance for ageism, while thinking styles revealed that closed-mindedness positively correlated with acceptance of hate language, whereas open-minded and effortful thinking negatively correlated.Social comparison of opinions was associated with lower tolerance for direct hate language, reflecting the influence of societal norms.These findings highlight the protective role of education, cognitive openness, and social comparison in reducing prejudice and have practical implications for designing interventions aimed at mitigating hate language.

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CRITICAL THINKING AND SOCIAL NORMS AS BUFFERS AGAINST HATE SPEECH ACCEPTANCE · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS