VALIDATION OF THE GEORGIAN ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCREENING INSTRUMENT

No reliable and valid measure of adaptive behavior is available in the Republic of Georgia.Thus, the Georgian Adaptive Behavior Screening Instrument-Research Version (GABSI-RV) was designed to provide data from which individual educational plans can be designed and monitored.This study's aim was to determine the psychometric features of the GABSI-RV with emphasis on evaluating the discriminatory capacity of the GABSI-RV using clinical (intellectual disability) and non-clinical groups of different ages.Participants were children and adolescents ages 4-18 divided into clinical (N=315); intellectual disability) and non-clinical comparison (N=296) groups.Results showed strong test-retest and inter-rater reliability.Analyses showed high internal consistency and that the measure discriminated across age groups.This measure has strong potential to fill and important gap in Georgia's education and mental health service delivery systems.The strategies deployed in this study have broad applicability for similar efforts in developing countries.

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36315/2025inpact122
Primary Topic
Human Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VALIDATION OF THE GEORGIAN ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCREENING INSTRUMENT

Human Health and Disease
article

VALIDATION OF THE GEORGIAN ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCREENING INSTRUMENT

article en

Abstract

No reliable and valid measure of adaptive behavior is available in the Republic of Georgia.Thus, the Georgian Adaptive Behavior Screening Instrument-Research Version (GABSI-RV) was designed to provide data from which individual educational plans can be designed and monitored.This study's aim was to determine the psychometric features of the GABSI-RV with emphasis on evaluating the discriminatory capacity of the GABSI-RV using clinical (intellectual disability) and non-clinical groups of different ages.Participants were children and adolescents ages 4-18 divided into clinical (N=315); intellectual disability) and non-clinical comparison (N=296) groups.Results showed strong test-retest and inter-rater reliability.Analyses showed high internal consistency and that the measure discriminated across age groups.This measure has strong potential to fill and important gap in Georgia's education and mental health service delivery systems.The strategies deployed in this study have broad applicability for similar efforts in developing countries.

Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Human Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.