Glyph norming: Human and computational measurements of shape angularity in writing systems

Writing systems are an underused source of stimuli for behavioral and computational experiments in cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics, and anthropology, despite being ecologically relevant and systematically different in shape, structure, and orientation. One possible reason that glyphs of writing systems are not commonly used in behavioral research concerns their profound complexity. However, recent developments in computer vision (i.e., geometric shape analysis) offer tools to automatically assess their visual dimensions. The current work describes an open-access database of 3,208 glyphs from diverse writing systems that have been normed by computational analyses in terms of shape angularity using an array of measurements. We further validate these norms by obtaining human judgments of angularity for a subset of 400 glyphs and show that they correlate highly with computational measures, in particular with first-order entropy of edge orientation. Additionally, we provide methods for standardized glyph generation based on Unicode ranges, a straightforward example of computational shape analysis, and a demonstration of automated transliteration of glyphs from Unicode strings using a pre-existing Python library. These procedures should facilitate the characterization of angularity of new glyphs and any other kind of visual shape by independent researchers. The present work will be helpful to scientists working across different topics in the various cognitive science subdisciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02682-7
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glyph norming: Human and computational measurements of shape angularity in writing systems

Julio Santiago, Nikolai Huckle, Alexander Porto, Alexander Kranjec et al.
Behavior Research Methods
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Glyph norming: Human and computational measurements of shape angularity in writing systems

Julio Santiago, Nikolai Huckle, Alexander Porto, Alexander Kranjec, Alexander Basalyga
article en

Abstract

Writing systems are an underused source of stimuli for behavioral and computational experiments in cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics, and anthropology, despite being ecologically relevant and systematically different in shape, structure, and orientation. One possible reason that glyphs of writing systems are not commonly used in behavioral research concerns their profound complexity. However, recent developments in computer vision (i.e., geometric shape analysis) offer tools to automatically assess their visual dimensions. The current work describes an open-access database of 3,208 glyphs from diverse writing systems that have been normed by computational analyses in terms of shape angularity using an array of measurements. We further validate these norms by obtaining human judgments of angularity for a subset of 400 glyphs and show that they correlate highly with computational measures, in particular with first-order entropy of edge orientation. Additionally, we provide methods for standardized glyph generation based on Unicode ranges, a straightforward example of computational shape analysis, and a demonstration of automated transliteration of glyphs from Unicode strings using a pre-existing Python library. These procedures should facilitate the characterization of angularity of new glyphs and any other kind of visual shape by independent researchers. The present work will be helpful to scientists working across different topics in the various cognitive science subdisciplines.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 57(6)
Duquesne University (US), Universidad de Granada (ES), Oldham Council (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.