Transformer-based model for predicting jet grout column diameter

• Transformer encoder model for predicting the diameters of jet grout columns. • Variation of jet grout diameter predictions with key variables with jet grout type, soil type, specific energy, and SPT-N value. • Design charts of jet grout column diameter predictions considering jet grout type, soil type, specific energy, and SPT-N value. • Comparison of performance of Transformer encoder model with ANN and other empirical methods. This study introduces a Transformer encoder model designed to predict the diameter of jet grout columns. The model utilizes key parameters, including Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-values, specific energy applied during jet grouting, soil type, and jet grout type, derived from the largest compiled dataset based on published case histories and project, consisting of 239 cases. These inputs are tokenized and processed to predict jet grout column diameters. The model was trained on a training dataset, internally validated using k-fold cross-validation, and externally validated with a test dataset to enhance generalizability. The model prediction was compared against diameters calculated using empirical equations, and benchmark machine learning models including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Random Forest, and XGBoost. Results demonstrate that the Transformer encoder model outperforms both empirical equations and ANNs, achieving higher prediction accuracy (R 2 =0.77) on the test dataset. While Random Forest and XGBoost showed marginally better accuracy on the test dataset, their performance on unseen design chart data was significantly weaker, highlighting the better generalization capability of Transformer encoder model. Additionally, this study employs SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for the interpretation of the Transformer encoder model. Overall, this study advances the field by introducing a Transformer encoder model for jet grout prediction, improving predictive accuracy and generalizability, and offering a structured approach for handling complex geotechnical datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geodata and AI.
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoai.2025.100021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transformer-based model for predicting jet grout column diameter

Joseph T. Coe, Yichuan Zhu, Rakam Lama Tamang
2 citations
Geodata and AI.
Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
1.91
article

Transformer-based model for predicting jet grout column diameter

Joseph T. Coe, Yichuan Zhu, Rakam Lama Tamang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Transformer encoder model for predicting the diameters of jet grout columns. • Variation of jet grout diameter predictions with key variables with jet grout type, soil type, specific energy, and SPT-N value. • Design charts of jet grout column diameter predictions considering jet grout type, soil type, specific energy, and SPT-N value. • Comparison of performance of Transformer encoder model with ANN and other empirical methods. This study introduces a Transformer encoder model designed to predict the diameter of jet grout columns. The model utilizes key parameters, including Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-values, specific energy applied during jet grouting, soil type, and jet grout type, derived from the largest compiled dataset based on published case histories and project, consisting of 239 cases. These inputs are tokenized and processed to predict jet grout column diameters. The model was trained on a training dataset, internally validated using k-fold cross-validation, and externally validated with a test dataset to enhance generalizability. The model prediction was compared against diameters calculated using empirical equations, and benchmark machine learning models including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Random Forest, and XGBoost. Results demonstrate that the Transformer encoder model outperforms both empirical equations and ANNs, achieving higher prediction accuracy (R 2 =0.77) on the test dataset. While Random Forest and XGBoost showed marginally better accuracy on the test dataset, their performance on unseen design chart data was significantly weaker, highlighting the better generalization capability of Transformer encoder model. Additionally, this study employs SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for the interpretation of the Transformer encoder model. Overall, this study advances the field by introducing a Transformer encoder model for jet grout prediction, improving predictive accuracy and generalizability, and offering a structured approach for handling complex geotechnical datasets.

Geodata and AI.Vol. 3
San Jose State University (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.