Achieving energy sustainability of Pakistan's power sector through long-term scenario modeling and analysis

Pakistan’s energy sector faces significant challenges compounded by the impacts of climate change from fossil fuel-based emissions. The country’s energy sector remains heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels. This reliance also exposes the country to economic vulnerabilities from the volatility of global oil prices, resulting in power shortages and escalating electricity prices. This research explores how long-term energy planning can address these issues by examining four scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), Zero-Emission (ZE), Indigenous Coal (IC), and Energy Efficiency (EE) for 2030 and 2050 using the EnergyPLAN software. The scenarios are evaluated and ranked using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) multi-criteria decision-making technique. Results are compared for policy alignment with Pakistan’s Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement. The EnergyPLAN simulation results show that the ZE scenario, a 100% renewable energy-based system, can meet 1706 TWh demand by 2050, with annual costs of $ 632 Bn, and give a CO 2 reduction of 662 MTCO 2 compared to BAU. The BAU scenario requires $ 610.12 Bn with emissions of 700 MTCO 2 , while the IC scenario incurs lower costs of $ 558.95 Bn but has the highest emissions at 889 MTCO 2 . The EE scenario achieves the lowest costs at $ 551.39 Bn with 450 MTCO 2 emissions due to improved energy efficiency. The WASPAS results emphasize the need for significant investment in renewable energy and aggressive implementation of energy efficiency measures for a sustainable power sector. This study aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers and energy planners to identify an optimal energy scenario, balancing economic, environmental, and policy factors. • EnergyPLAN is used to evaluate four long-term energy scenarios for 2030 and 2050. • The scenarios are ranked using a multi-criteria method and compared with the international commitments. • The ranking favors the Zero Emission scenario and Energy Efficiency scenario for all criteria. • Results align with Pakistan’s NDC, emphasizing strong renewable & efficiency expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136549
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Achieving energy sustainability of Pakistan's power sector through long-term scenario modeling and analysis

Laveet Kumar, Benedetto Nastasi, Davide Astiaso Garcia, Daniele Groppi et al.
7 citations
Energy
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
5.11
article

Achieving energy sustainability of Pakistan's power sector through long-term scenario modeling and analysis

Laveet Kumar, Benedetto Nastasi, Davide Astiaso Garcia, Daniele Groppi, Farhan Haider Joyo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Pakistan’s energy sector faces significant challenges compounded by the impacts of climate change from fossil fuel-based emissions. The country’s energy sector remains heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels. This reliance also exposes the country to economic vulnerabilities from the volatility of global oil prices, resulting in power shortages and escalating electricity prices. This research explores how long-term energy planning can address these issues by examining four scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), Zero-Emission (ZE), Indigenous Coal (IC), and Energy Efficiency (EE) for 2030 and 2050 using the EnergyPLAN software. The scenarios are evaluated and ranked using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) multi-criteria decision-making technique. Results are compared for policy alignment with Pakistan’s Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement. The EnergyPLAN simulation results show that the ZE scenario, a 100% renewable energy-based system, can meet 1706 TWh demand by 2050, with annual costs of $ 632 Bn, and give a CO 2 reduction of 662 MTCO 2 compared to BAU. The BAU scenario requires $ 610.12 Bn with emissions of 700 MTCO 2 , while the IC scenario incurs lower costs of $ 558.95 Bn but has the highest emissions at 889 MTCO 2 . The EE scenario achieves the lowest costs at $ 551.39 Bn with 450 MTCO 2 emissions due to improved energy efficiency. The WASPAS results emphasize the need for significant investment in renewable energy and aggressive implementation of energy efficiency measures for a sustainable power sector. This study aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers and energy planners to identify an optimal energy scenario, balancing economic, environmental, and policy factors. • EnergyPLAN is used to evaluate four long-term energy scenarios for 2030 and 2050. • The scenarios are ranked using a multi-criteria method and compared with the international commitments. • The ranking favors the Zero Emission scenario and Energy Efficiency scenario for all criteria. • Results align with Pakistan’s NDC, emphasizing strong renewable & efficiency expansion.

EnergyVol. 328
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (PK), Qatar University (QA), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
5.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.