Dropout and completion in iCBT for university students: Insights from a thematic analysis

Online cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) is a promising treatment for depression and anxiety among university students but faces high dropout rates. Understanding the reasons behind dropout or completion can help improve the implementation of iCBT in educational settings. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 32 students who dropped out early (<i>n</i> = 9), midway (<i>n</i> = 12), or completed (<i>n</i> = 11) guided or unguided iCBT in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2012) thematic analysis. Common themes among dropouts included personal factors (like competing priorities), perceived difficulty or redundancy of the intervention, and lack of human interaction. Early dropouts uniquely cited disbelief in the intervention's efficacy and preference for other mental health support. Midway dropouts mentioned issues with the interactivity, feedback, content, perceived effectiveness, and lack of personalization. Completers had positive initial impressions, valued the online format, found the exercises and guidance helpful, and felt cared for. The themes identified among participants who dropped out from or completed the iCBT intervention provide valuable insights into factors which may be of importance for retention. Implications regarding setting expectations, participant selection, interactive functionalities, personalized feedback, and the role of therapist guidance are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internet Interventions
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100831
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dropout and completion in iCBT for university students: Insights from a thematic analysis

Anke M. Klein, Reínout W. Wiers, Lisa de Koning, C.M. van der Heijde et al.
4 citations
Internet Interventions
Digital Mental Health Interventions
6.18
article

Dropout and completion in iCBT for university students: Insights from a thematic analysis

Anke M. Klein, Reínout W. Wiers, Lisa de Koning, C.M. van der Heijde, Jurrijn Koelen, Matilda Nottage, Peter Vonk
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Online cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) is a promising treatment for depression and anxiety among university students but faces high dropout rates. Understanding the reasons behind dropout or completion can help improve the implementation of iCBT in educational settings. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 32 students who dropped out early (<i>n</i> = 9), midway (<i>n</i> = 12), or completed (<i>n</i> = 11) guided or unguided iCBT in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2012) thematic analysis. Common themes among dropouts included personal factors (like competing priorities), perceived difficulty or redundancy of the intervention, and lack of human interaction. Early dropouts uniquely cited disbelief in the intervention's efficacy and preference for other mental health support. Midway dropouts mentioned issues with the interactivity, feedback, content, perceived effectiveness, and lack of personalization. Completers had positive initial impressions, valued the online format, found the exercises and guidance helpful, and felt cared for. The themes identified among participants who dropped out from or completed the iCBT intervention provide valuable insights into factors which may be of importance for retention. Implications regarding setting expectations, participant selection, interactive functionalities, personalized feedback, and the role of therapist guidance are discussed.

Internet InterventionsVol. 40
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, University of Twente
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.