Attention beyond the battlefield: Voters’ responses to foreign military investments

This study examines how voters respond to non-crisis military developments, focusing on general military, cyber, and nuclear capabilities. Using a survey experiment, it explores how information about these developments shapes voters’ preferences for US military spending. The findings show that voters are especially attentive to foreign cyber build-ups, with some assessing these developments rationally, while others rely on heuristics. These results offer a nuanced understanding of how emerging military technologies influence public perceptions and decision-making on military spending in the digital era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942251339414
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attention beyond the battlefield: Voters’ responses to foreign military investments

Nadiya Kostyuk, Ryan Shandler
Conflict Management and Peace Science
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Attention beyond the battlefield: Voters’ responses to foreign military investments

Nadiya Kostyuk, Ryan Shandler
article en

Abstract

This study examines how voters respond to non-crisis military developments, focusing on general military, cyber, and nuclear capabilities. Using a survey experiment, it explores how information about these developments shapes voters’ preferences for US military spending. The findings show that voters are especially attentive to foreign cyber build-ups, with some assessing these developments rationally, while others rely on heuristics. These results offer a nuanced understanding of how emerging military technologies influence public perceptions and decision-making on military spending in the digital era.

Conflict Management and Peace Science
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.