Research on the Theory of Procedural Justice in Civil Litigation Inclusiveness

The theory of procedural justice, which was transplanted to China in the 1990s, has undergone theoretical development and has had a profound impact on China's civil litigation procedures and judicial practices. However, it has also encountered challenges such as procedural instrumentalism and judicial centrism. The overall value orientation of our society is developing towards diversification, which has also led to the diversification of civil disputes and people's demand for justice in China. The theory of procedural justice in civil litigation not only needs to break the closed nature of research fields, but also needs to break the closed nature of justice theories in other fields. The inclusiveness of civil litigation procedures also requires the concept of sharing and co governance to resolve disputes. This article systematically constructs a program based on the theory of dialogue mechanism, aiming to open up channels for all forces that can assist in resolving civil disputes to enter the civil litigation process and help resolve disputes; On the other hand, based on the theory of open procedural justice, the connection and inclusiveness between civil litigation procedures and other dispute resolution mechanisms have been constructed at the theoretical and institutional levels, thus forming an inclusive theory of procedural justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v7n1.07
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Theory of Procedural Justice in Civil Litigation Inclusiveness

Guangyu Zhao
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Research on the Theory of Procedural Justice in Civil Litigation Inclusiveness

Guangyu Zhao
article en

Abstract

The theory of procedural justice, which was transplanted to China in the 1990s, has undergone theoretical development and has had a profound impact on China's civil litigation procedures and judicial practices. However, it has also encountered challenges such as procedural instrumentalism and judicial centrism. The overall value orientation of our society is developing towards diversification, which has also led to the diversification of civil disputes and people's demand for justice in China. The theory of procedural justice in civil litigation not only needs to break the closed nature of research fields, but also needs to break the closed nature of justice theories in other fields. The inclusiveness of civil litigation procedures also requires the concept of sharing and co governance to resolve disputes. This article systematically constructs a program based on the theory of dialogue mechanism, aiming to open up channels for all forces that can assist in resolving civil disputes to enter the civil litigation process and help resolve disputes; On the other hand, based on the theory of open procedural justice, the connection and inclusiveness between civil litigation procedures and other dispute resolution mechanisms have been constructed at the theoretical and institutional levels, thus forming an inclusive theory of procedural justice.

International Journal of Social Sciences and Public AdministrationVol. 7(1)
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.