Variability in ultimate humeral height of an inlay humeral stem does not impact outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Clinical outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck shaft angle designed inlay humeral implant are favorable, with either inlay or onlay implantation. Clinical outcomes were excellent, with minimal differences based on final humeral positioning. The inlay stem offers the advantage to be placed as either inlay or onlay, based on the surgeon's preference or the patient's needs. Patients' characteristics and surgeon preference should be considered when deciding which configuration to use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSES International
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.017
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability in ultimate humeral height of an inlay humeral stem does not impact outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Stefan H Greiner, Michael Walton, Mark T. Dillon, Robert Alexander Creighton et al.
JSES International
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Variability in ultimate humeral height of an inlay humeral stem does not impact outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Stefan H Greiner, Michael Walton, Mark T. Dillon, Robert Alexander Creighton, Justin W. Griffin, Sven Lichtenberg, G. Russell Huffman, Bradford O. Parsons, Dirk Petré, Brian Waterman, Michael J. Kissenberth, John M. Tokish, Anup Ajit Shah, Patrick J. Denard, Brandon J. Erickson, Tim R. Lenters, Patric Raiss, Tamika M. Burrus, David Lutton, Brian C. Werner, Evan S. Lederman, Asheesh Bedi, Max A Saráchaga Mendoza, Kevin W. Farmer, Michael J. Bercik, Peter Habermeyer, Philipp Moroder, Tyler J. Brolin, Julia Lee, Matthew Thomas Provencher, Ryan C. Rauck, Bruce S. Miller, Christopher O’Grady, Joern Steinbeck, Reuben Gobezie, Daniel Davis, Sam Harmsen, Ben Sears
article en

Abstract

Clinical outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck shaft angle designed inlay humeral implant are favorable, with either inlay or onlay implantation. Clinical outcomes were excellent, with minimal differences based on final humeral positioning. The inlay stem offers the advantage to be placed as either inlay or onlay, based on the surgeon's preference or the patient's needs. Patients' characteristics and surgeon preference should be considered when deciding which configuration to use.

JSES InternationalVol. 9(5)
Hospital General de México (MX), Cleveland Shoulder Institute (US), Hospital Angeles Pedregal (MX), Schulthess-Klinik (CH), Orthopädische Praxis (DE), University of Virginia (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Arthrex, Stryker, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Pacira BioSciences, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.