What good is agroecology? Predominant narratives about agroecology in Africa

Agroecology is still a marginal approach to agricultural development in Africa when compared to industrial approaches, despite growing evidence of its potential to address core challenges of food insecurity, poverty, and soil degradation. This paper investigates one possible explanation for this discrepancy: the discursive landscape of African agriculture. Taking inspiration from narrative analysis, we document stories about agroecology as told by key actors in the food system: farmers, pastoralists, NGO workers, extension officers, government officials, and researchers. Based on 208 interviews with key informants (KIs) across nine African case studies, we identified three distinct narratives: Agroecology is: 1) a tool in a toolbox 2) for poor farmers 3) the better path. In addition to these narratives, we report KIs' perceptions of two narrative components, namely their definition of agroecology and the key challenges affecting agriculture in their case study site. We use these problem framings to evaluate how logically agroecology fits as a solution in this story, and thus its discursive potential as an approach to agricultural development. We find that many respondents do not consider agroecology to be an effective or relevant solution to major food system challenges, or that they have a limited understanding of the full breadth of agroecology. We suggest that organizations seeking to promote agroecology guide their efforts according to a key agroecological principle, knowledge co-creation, to better understand farmers’ views and experiences with specific agroecological practices in the African context. • Agroecology's potential is shaped by how it is defined and framed as a solution. • We identified 3 cross-cutting narratives of agroecology held by food systems actors. • Few respondents saw agroecology as a systemic alternative to industrial agriculture. • Narrow definitions of agroecology limited its relevance to agricultural challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103706
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What good is agroecology? Predominant narratives about agroecology in Africa

Stephanie Enloe, Sidney Madsen, Jill A. Fisher, Esther Laske et al.
4 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
19.33
article

What good is agroecology? Predominant narratives about agroecology in Africa

Stephanie Enloe, Sidney Madsen, Jill A. Fisher, Esther Laske, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Aïssa Ndiereby Sall
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Agroecology is still a marginal approach to agricultural development in Africa when compared to industrial approaches, despite growing evidence of its potential to address core challenges of food insecurity, poverty, and soil degradation. This paper investigates one possible explanation for this discrepancy: the discursive landscape of African agriculture. Taking inspiration from narrative analysis, we document stories about agroecology as told by key actors in the food system: farmers, pastoralists, NGO workers, extension officers, government officials, and researchers. Based on 208 interviews with key informants (KIs) across nine African case studies, we identified three distinct narratives: Agroecology is: 1) a tool in a toolbox 2) for poor farmers 3) the better path. In addition to these narratives, we report KIs' perceptions of two narrative components, namely their definition of agroecology and the key challenges affecting agriculture in their case study site. We use these problem framings to evaluate how logically agroecology fits as a solution in this story, and thus its discursive potential as an approach to agricultural development. We find that many respondents do not consider agroecology to be an effective or relevant solution to major food system challenges, or that they have a limited understanding of the full breadth of agroecology. We suggest that organizations seeking to promote agroecology guide their efforts according to a key agroecological principle, knowledge co-creation, to better understand farmers’ views and experiences with specific agroecological practices in the African context. • Agroecology's potential is shaped by how it is defined and framed as a solution. • We identified 3 cross-cutting narratives of agroecology held by food systems actors. • Few respondents saw agroecology as a systemic alternative to industrial agriculture. • Narrow definitions of agroecology limited its relevance to agricultural challenges.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 118
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Cornell University (US), Agriculture and Food (AU), Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (SN)
Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires Étrangères
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
19.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.