The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s

The Constitutional Court has been the target of several political attacks over the past three years, each with its tactics and goals. The politicization of the court by the government poses the greatest danger to its independence. This study combines qualitative analysis with socio-legal study methodology. According to this study, the court gets politicized in two ways. The first type is extrajudicial, which indicates that political actors acting outside the court system constitute. The second type is intra-judicial, which involves the major actors in the legal system. In this case, the major actors are the judges of the Constitutional Court. This study also elucidates the way certain components with a legal component and others with a socio-political component resulted in the politicization of the independence of the constitutional court.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance.
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/seajalgov.v1i2.15535
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s

Idul Rishan
South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance.
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s

Idul Rishan
article en

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has been the target of several political attacks over the past three years, each with its tactics and goals. The politicization of the court by the government poses the greatest danger to its independence. This study combines qualitative analysis with socio-legal study methodology. According to this study, the court gets politicized in two ways. The first type is extrajudicial, which indicates that political actors acting outside the court system constitute. The second type is intra-judicial, which involves the major actors in the legal system. In this case, the major actors are the judges of the Constitutional Court. This study also elucidates the way certain components with a legal component and others with a socio-political component resulted in the politicization of the independence of the constitutional court.

South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance.Vol. 1(2)
Islamic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s — Idul Rishan · South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS