Do Analysts Care About <scp>ESG</scp> Performance? Evidence From Tracking Decisions

ABSTRACT This study examines the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on analysts' tracking decisions. This study develops a theoretical model involving managers, funds, and brokers. The model finds that under optimal decision‐making conditions, ESG ratings have a positive impact on analyst coverage. Empirical research indicates that ESG performance positively influences analyst coverage in subsequent years. All causal inference methods confirm the significant positive causal effect of ESG performance on analysts' tracking decisions. Heterogeneity analysis shows that analysts pay more attention to ESG ratings for companies with higher market value. The mechanism analysis suggests that strong ESG performance can increase analyst coverage by reducing information asymmetry and attracting mutual fund investors. These findings provide valuable insights into the relationship between ESG performance and analysts' behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3179
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Analysts Care About ESG Performance? Evidence From Tracking Decisions

Zihao Lin
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Do Analysts Care About ESG Performance? Evidence From Tracking Decisions

Zihao Lin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on analysts' tracking decisions. This study develops a theoretical model involving managers, funds, and brokers. The model finds that under optimal decision‐making conditions, ESG ratings have a positive impact on analyst coverage. Empirical research indicates that ESG performance positively influences analyst coverage in subsequent years. All causal inference methods confirm the significant positive causal effect of ESG performance on analysts' tracking decisions. Heterogeneity analysis shows that analysts pay more attention to ESG ratings for companies with higher market value. The mechanism analysis suggests that strong ESG performance can increase analyst coverage by reducing information asymmetry and attracting mutual fund investors. These findings provide valuable insights into the relationship between ESG performance and analysts' behaviour.

International Journal of Finance & EconomicsVol. 31(1)
Pearl River Hydraulic Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.