Binder Effects on Processing, Mechanical Properties, and Performance of Thin Sulfide Solid‐State Electrolytes

All‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) offer enhanced safety and energy density compared to conventional lithium‐ion batteries by replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs). Among SSEs, sulfide‐based electrolytes exhibit high ionic conductivity and mechanical deformability, making them promising candidates for next‐generation energy storage. However, their practical implementation is hindered by interfacial instability, mechanical brittleness, and challenges in fabricating ultrathin electrolyte membranes (<30 μm) with robust mechanical integrity. This study systematically examines the influence of polymeric binders—polyisobutylene, hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber, and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS)—on the structural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance of thin sulfide SSE membranes. Key findings reveal that SEBS enables the fabrication of ultrathin, uniform membranes, while binder elasticity significantly affects structural stability during cycling. Operando stack pressure measurements indicate that binder properties directly influence adhesion force for LPSCl particles, influencing their stabilizing cycling period. These results underscore the critical role of polymer binders beyond mechanical reinforcement, positioning them as essential design variables in sulfide SSE engineering. By linking binder chemistry to processability and electrochemical performance, this study provides insights into optimizing sulfide SSEs, advancing their commercial viability in ASSBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries & Supercaps
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202500192
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binder Effects on Processing, Mechanical Properties, and Performance of Thin Sulfide Solid‐State Electrolytes

Chanho Kim, Fuead Hasan, Andre Adam, Guang Yang et al.
1 citations
Batteries & Supercaps
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
0.73
article

Binder Effects on Processing, Mechanical Properties, and Performance of Thin Sulfide Solid‐State Electrolytes

Chanho Kim, Fuead Hasan, Andre Adam, Guang Yang, Wenda Wu, Jagjit Nanda, Thomas A. Zawodzinski, Yuanshun Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

All‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) offer enhanced safety and energy density compared to conventional lithium‐ion batteries by replacing flammable liquid electrolytes with solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs). Among SSEs, sulfide‐based electrolytes exhibit high ionic conductivity and mechanical deformability, making them promising candidates for next‐generation energy storage. However, their practical implementation is hindered by interfacial instability, mechanical brittleness, and challenges in fabricating ultrathin electrolyte membranes (<30 μm) with robust mechanical integrity. This study systematically examines the influence of polymeric binders—polyisobutylene, hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber, and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS)—on the structural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance of thin sulfide SSE membranes. Key findings reveal that SEBS enables the fabrication of ultrathin, uniform membranes, while binder elasticity significantly affects structural stability during cycling. Operando stack pressure measurements indicate that binder properties directly influence adhesion force for LPSCl particles, influencing their stabilizing cycling period. These results underscore the critical role of polymer binders beyond mechanical reinforcement, positioning them as essential design variables in sulfide SSE engineering. By linking binder chemistry to processability and electrochemical performance, this study provides insights into optimizing sulfide SSEs, advancing their commercial viability in ASSBs.

Batteries & SupercapsVol. 8(11)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.