Role of Machine Learning in Predicting Radiation-Induced Toxicity

Background: Radiation therapy is fundamental to cancer treatment but frequently entails various levels of radiation-induced damage. Forecasting which people are most susceptible to substantial toxicity poses a problem owing to inter-individual heterogeneity. Machine learning (ML) methodologies provide a means to model intricate, nonlinear associations across clinical, dosimetric, and genetic factors, thereby facilitating enhanced toxicity prediction and individualized radiation planning. Objective: To assess the efficacy of machine learning models in forecasting radiation-induced toxicity in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy at a tertiary care facility in India. Methods: This prospective study was carried out at IGIMS, Patna, over a period of 24 months and involved 120 patients receiving radiation for diverse cancers. Clinical data, radiation dosimetry metrics, and patient-reported toxicity assessments were gathered. Multiple machine learning methods, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machines (SVM), and gradient boosting, were trained and validated to forecast acute and late toxicity outcomes based on established toxicity grading (CTCAE v5.0). The evaluation of model performance was conducted utilizing metrics such as AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Results: Among the 120 patients, radiation-induced toxicity was noted in 72 (60%). The random forest and gradient boosting models attained superior performance, with AUC values of 0.89 and 0.91, respectively. Key predictive factors encompassed total dosage, fractionation protocol, organ-specific dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics, and pre-existing comorbidities. Machine learning models substantially surpassed conventional logistic regression in sensitivity and overall accuracy for toxicity prediction. Conclusion: Machine learning methods demonstrate superior predictive accuracy for radiation-induced toxicity compared to conventional statistical models. Incorporating machine learning into radiation oncology workflows may enable the early detection of high-risk patients, assist with adaptive planning, and eventually improve treatment safety and personalization. Keywords: Radiation-induced toxicity, machine learning, radiotherapy, predictive modeling, random forest, gradient boosting, CTCAE, dose-volume histogram, personalized oncology, IGIMS Patna

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v9i1.3042
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Machine Learning in Predicting Radiation-Induced Toxicity

Rajesh Kumar Singh, Harihar Nath Tiwari, Prince Kumar, Subhadra Choubey et al.
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Role of Machine Learning in Predicting Radiation-Induced Toxicity

Rajesh Kumar Singh, Harihar Nath Tiwari, Prince Kumar, Subhadra Choubey, Seema Devi, Ravi Byahut
article en

Abstract

Background: Radiation therapy is fundamental to cancer treatment but frequently entails various levels of radiation-induced damage. Forecasting which people are most susceptible to substantial toxicity poses a problem owing to inter-individual heterogeneity. Machine learning (ML) methodologies provide a means to model intricate, nonlinear associations across clinical, dosimetric, and genetic factors, thereby facilitating enhanced toxicity prediction and individualized radiation planning. Objective: To assess the efficacy of machine learning models in forecasting radiation-induced toxicity in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy at a tertiary care facility in India. Methods: This prospective study was carried out at IGIMS, Patna, over a period of 24 months and involved 120 patients receiving radiation for diverse cancers. Clinical data, radiation dosimetry metrics, and patient-reported toxicity assessments were gathered. Multiple machine learning methods, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machines (SVM), and gradient boosting, were trained and validated to forecast acute and late toxicity outcomes based on established toxicity grading (CTCAE v5.0). The evaluation of model performance was conducted utilizing metrics such as AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Results: Among the 120 patients, radiation-induced toxicity was noted in 72 (60%). The random forest and gradient boosting models attained superior performance, with AUC values of 0.89 and 0.91, respectively. Key predictive factors encompassed total dosage, fractionation protocol, organ-specific dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics, and pre-existing comorbidities. Machine learning models substantially surpassed conventional logistic regression in sensitivity and overall accuracy for toxicity prediction. Conclusion: Machine learning methods demonstrate superior predictive accuracy for radiation-induced toxicity compared to conventional statistical models. Incorporating machine learning into radiation oncology workflows may enable the early detection of high-risk patients, assist with adaptive planning, and eventually improve treatment safety and personalization. Keywords: Radiation-induced toxicity, machine learning, radiotherapy, predictive modeling, random forest, gradient boosting, CTCAE, dose-volume histogram, personalized oncology, IGIMS Patna

International Journal of Medical and Biomedical StudiesVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.