Rejecting Securitisation: Organised Civil Resistance Against the USA Patriot Act

The legislation and implementation of the US Patriot Act have opened up a field of political discussion with securitisation at its centre. Although the expansion of authoritative power under the securitisation discourse seems irresistible as the decisions of the political elites in federal bureaucrat was announced, there is still room for civilian action practices in the political process under the theoretical framework dominated by the discourse. This article discusses the anti-securitization discourse established by civilian political resistance groups represented by the ACLU, as well as their political practices of overturning the Patriot Act. By evaluating the significance of the impact of popular movements on the local and federal legislative and judicial branches, the paper attempts to discuss the effectiveness of popular resistance to securitisation. The article aims to construct the interactive process of authoritative and popular political subjects, and further evaluate the effect of actual political resistance in a securitisation event.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Humanities Research
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2024.22750
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rejecting Securitisation: Organised Civil Resistance Against the USA Patriot Act

Shuaibin Zhang
Communications in Humanities Research
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
article

Rejecting Securitisation: Organised Civil Resistance Against the USA Patriot Act

Shuaibin Zhang
article en

Abstract

The legislation and implementation of the US Patriot Act have opened up a field of political discussion with securitisation at its centre. Although the expansion of authoritative power under the securitisation discourse seems irresistible as the decisions of the political elites in federal bureaucrat was announced, there is still room for civilian action practices in the political process under the theoretical framework dominated by the discourse. This article discusses the anti-securitization discourse established by civilian political resistance groups represented by the ACLU, as well as their political practices of overturning the Patriot Act. By evaluating the significance of the impact of popular movements on the local and federal legislative and judicial branches, the paper attempts to discuss the effectiveness of popular resistance to securitisation. The article aims to construct the interactive process of authoritative and popular political subjects, and further evaluate the effect of actual political resistance in a securitisation event.

Communications in Humanities ResearchVol. 59(1)
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rejecting Securitisation: Organised Civil Resistance Against the USA Patriot Act — Shuaibin Zhang · Communications in Humanities Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS