Attachment Styles and Coping Efficiency: Navigating Academic Stress
This study explores the correlation between adolescents and young adults attachment styles and the effectiveness of coping mechanisms in managing academic and daily stress. Academic stress has been proven to significantly alter mental wellness and academic performance of students, yet the role of individual differences in attachment styles in management stress responses remains a mystery. The Attachment theory suggests that secure, anxious, and avoidant attachment styles greatly influence emotional regulation and coping mechanisms, which directly moderate stress management. To visualize this relation with data , 100 participants aged 14-22 were recruited for this study. Having 25 participants of each attachment style. Each participant completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) on a monthly basis to record their perceived stress levels during academic tasks, and attachment style was measured by using a standardized attachment style questionnaire. Over the course of a year, 80% of the participants had switch between coping mechanisms, including Problem-focused coping, Emotion-focused coping, Avoidance coping social support seeking, cognitive restructuring and physical exercise. The 20 participants that are securely attached in relationships are predicted to have a higher coping efficiency. Whereas we predict that participants that are Anxiously attached tend to coping slower against stress. Lastly, we predict that avoiding and disorderly attached participants will have drastic change in stress levels regarding coping mechanisms. This study aims to provide evidence into how different attachment styles can influence coping efficiency under academic stress in students and young adults, providing data for later on studies and educational systems to use in building mental wellness programs.
Authors
- Joshua M. Liao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-9074)
Institutions
- Theodore Roosevelt High School (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- Published
- 2025-05-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.22968
- Primary Topic
- Health and Well-being Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00