A Critical Analysis of the Advantages and Limitations of the Teaching Methods under the Constructivism Theory

In recent years, the application of constructivism theory in courses has grown remarkably. Given the diverse teaching conditions and the varying needs of students, teachers frequently struggle to select suitable teaching approaches. It is essential to determine how teachers can effectively apply these methods to transition to a student-centered learning environment, enabling students to genuinely master what they have learned. Thus, a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and limitations of these methods is essential for teachers to make informed decisions. This study combines literature review with case analysis to explore these aspects. The results show that firstly, the scaffolding instruction is flexible but demands much from teachers, which has limited impact on student motivation, and presents more flaws in online courses. Secondly, the anchored instruction boosts confidence and grades, yet it requires complex evaluation and specific scenarios. Finally, the random access instruction stimulates interest and independent thinking but does not lead to improved grades, lacks teacher-student interaction, and needs strict evaluation.