Developing IBD Outcome Effect Size Thresholds to Inform Research, Guidelines, and Clinical Decisions

This is the first study to develop a consensus on magnitude thresholds for outcomes in IBD. These thresholds have been used in the development of the 2024 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of IBD but can and should also be used by study designers and, most importantly, by clinicians when discussing evidence with patients as part of shared decision making. Future work to validate these findings globally and with other groups, including patients, is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf085
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing IBD Outcome Effect Size Thresholds to Inform Research, Guidelines, and Clinical Decisions

Morris A. Gordon, Nader Shaban, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Shellie Jean Radford et al.
4 citations
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
11.26
article

Developing IBD Outcome Effect Size Thresholds to Inform Research, Guidelines, and Clinical Decisions

Morris A. Gordon, Nader Shaban, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Shellie Jean Radford, Fernando Magro, Alessandro Armuzzi, Gordon W. Moran, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Vipul Jairath
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This is the first study to develop a consensus on magnitude thresholds for outcomes in IBD. These thresholds have been used in the development of the 2024 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of IBD but can and should also be used by study designers and, most importantly, by clinicians when discussing evidence with patients as part of shared decision making. Future work to validate these findings globally and with other groups, including patients, is needed.

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesVol. 31(10)
Western University (CA), Humanitas University (IT), Inserm (FR), Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Lancashire (GB), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (PT), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Nutrition-Génétique et Exposition aux Risques Environnementaux (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
11.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.