Beyond Traditional: Clearing the Roadblocks to Advancement in Academic Medicine

In academic medicine, the label of nontraditional is often used to refer to scholars whose outputs or journeys differ from what is considered normative. Those who do not sufficiently align with traditional expectations may be at risk of being excluded from fully participating or achieving advancement in academic medicine, an experience that disproportionately affects groups who have been historically marginalized and underrepresented in medicine. In this eye opener, the authors use the lenses of their own stories in academic medicine to illustrate some of the traditional roadblocks experienced by these scholars, such as the lack of mentorship, the tendency to overlook or discourage work on nontraditional topics, and difficulty fitting innovative scholarship formats into curricula vitae or promotion packets. To clear the roadblocks, the authors call upon institutional leaders to enhance their processes, support systems, and criteria for learner and faculty academic advancement. Secondly, the authors call upon individuals to consider how they might engage in and frame their scholarly pursuits in a way that their merit can be readily ascertained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Medical Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1681
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Traditional: Clearing the Roadblocks to Advancement in Academic Medicine

Kimberly D. Manning, Pilar Ortega, Mara L. Becker, Teresa M. Chan
1 citations
Perspectives on Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
1.88
article

Beyond Traditional: Clearing the Roadblocks to Advancement in Academic Medicine

Kimberly D. Manning, Pilar Ortega, Mara L. Becker, Teresa M. Chan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In academic medicine, the label of nontraditional is often used to refer to scholars whose outputs or journeys differ from what is considered normative. Those who do not sufficiently align with traditional expectations may be at risk of being excluded from fully participating or achieving advancement in academic medicine, an experience that disproportionately affects groups who have been historically marginalized and underrepresented in medicine. In this eye opener, the authors use the lenses of their own stories in academic medicine to illustrate some of the traditional roadblocks experienced by these scholars, such as the lack of mentorship, the tendency to overlook or discourage work on nontraditional topics, and difficulty fitting innovative scholarship formats into curricula vitae or promotion packets. To clear the roadblocks, the authors call upon institutional leaders to enhance their processes, support systems, and criteria for learner and faculty academic advancement. Secondly, the authors call upon individuals to consider how they might engage in and frame their scholarly pursuits in a way that their merit can be readily ascertained.

Perspectives on Medical EducationVol. 14(1)
Small Business Administration (US), Emory University (US), Illinois College (US), Duke University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Office of Diversity and Inclusion (US), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Innovations in Medical Education
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.