Geotechnical data-driven possibility reliability assessment

Managing scarce, incomplete, or corrupted data is a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, often leading to conservative designs. However, the ongoing digitalization has enabled access to large, national-scale databases of indirect geotechnical data containing both qualitative and quantitative information, which can be exploited to support optioneering, site characterization, and design. Based on a newly proposed concept of possibilistic data-driven reliability, this Technical Note outlines a practical, fast, and accessible implementation procedure that does not require specialized expertise. Step-by-step guidance is provided for reliability-based assessment and design of geotechnical problems, ensuring consistency with standard code safety prescriptions. The procedure demonstrates how to utilize possibility distributions generated from Big Indirect Databases managed by third-party administrators, such as the British Geological Survey, to derive design input values for deterministic evaluations of geotechnical capacity or limit state domains. Engineering judgement is rigorously incorporated through a three-tier ‘degree of understanding’ framework worked example of an axially-loaded pile in bilayer soil, characterized using cone penetration test data, is also provided. • Step-by-step guidance for practitioners to conduct a novel reliability assessment. • Demonstration using a case study of an axially loaded pile. • The method leverages Big Indirect Databases to promote digitalization in Geotechnical Engineering. • Software is provided to generate data-driven design values. • The method supports both data-driven assessments and reliability-based design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Geotechnics
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107311
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geotechnical data-driven possibility reliability assessment

L. Holland, Marcus R. Dobbs, Alessandro Tombari, Giovanni Li Destri Nicosia et al.
1 citations
Computers and Geotechnics
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.30
article

Geotechnical data-driven possibility reliability assessment

L. Holland, Marcus R. Dobbs, Alessandro Tombari, Giovanni Li Destri Nicosia, Luciano Stefanini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Managing scarce, incomplete, or corrupted data is a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering, often leading to conservative designs. However, the ongoing digitalization has enabled access to large, national-scale databases of indirect geotechnical data containing both qualitative and quantitative information, which can be exploited to support optioneering, site characterization, and design. Based on a newly proposed concept of possibilistic data-driven reliability, this Technical Note outlines a practical, fast, and accessible implementation procedure that does not require specialized expertise. Step-by-step guidance is provided for reliability-based assessment and design of geotechnical problems, ensuring consistency with standard code safety prescriptions. The procedure demonstrates how to utilize possibility distributions generated from Big Indirect Databases managed by third-party administrators, such as the British Geological Survey, to derive design input values for deterministic evaluations of geotechnical capacity or limit state domains. Engineering judgement is rigorously incorporated through a three-tier ‘degree of understanding’ framework worked example of an axially-loaded pile in bilayer soil, characterized using cone penetration test data, is also provided. • Step-by-step guidance for practitioners to conduct a novel reliability assessment. • Demonstration using a case study of an axially loaded pile. • The method leverages Big Indirect Databases to promote digitalization in Geotechnical Engineering. • Software is provided to generate data-driven design values. • The method supports both data-driven assessments and reliability-based design.

Computers and GeotechnicsVol. 185
British Geological Survey (GB), University of Urbino (IT), University of Exeter (GB), Cowi (Denmark) (DK)
British Geological Survey, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.