Comparison of long-term clinical effect and re-pregnant outcomes between hysteroscopic resection and laparoscopic defect repair in patients with non-severe cesarean scar defect: a retrospective study
Although both hysteroscopic resection and laparoscopic defect repair have good clinical effects on improving the symptoms of non-severe CSD patients. But in contrast, the hysteroscopic resection displays the advantages of minimal trauma, shorter surgical time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, lower treatment costs, faster postoperative recovery, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and higher re-pregnancy rate. Hence, hysteroscopic resection is safe and effective, and could be the first choice for the treatment of no-severe CSD patients.
Authors
- X. Ouyang
- Shiyu Cheng
- Dongqin Deng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-0255)
- Mei Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-1156)
- Xin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6734-9034)
- Jing Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3588-2969)
- Yanli Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-7375)
- Jie Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-9559)
- Lin Chai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-3081)
- Han Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1474-2107)
- Dan Teng
- Tingzhu Meng
Institutions
- Hubei Provincial Women and Children's Hospital (CN)
- Wuhan Children's Hospital (CN)
- Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2025-05-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07667-0
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.06