Understanding research gaps and priorities for tobacco harm reduction in low-income and middle-income countries

Tobacco use is among the leading preventable causes of premature death worldwide, with disproportionate effects in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global tobacco control efforts have shown inconsistent results, highlighting the need for innovative approaches, such as tobacco harm reduction (THR), to complement existing strategies. We aimed to identify gaps in THR research in the global and LMIC contexts. We conducted a bibliometric review, using Scopus, to identify articles addressing THR published from January 2014 to August 2024. Research output was categorized by product type, geographical focus, volume of research output, and funding sources. A narrative synthesis was performed to outline research gaps and propose a strategic research agenda. THR research was dominated by e-cigarettes, primarily from high-income countries. Citations per 1 million smokers were highest in New Zealand (1,128.0), United Kingdom (634.3), United States (466.4), Australia (432.1), Switzerland (177.1), and South Korea (132.9). By contrast, rates were very low across Asia, Africa, and South America (range 1.8–53.5). Over the study period, research output increased only for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products. Publicly funded research tended to focus on public health concerns, while private-sector research focused on product safety and efficacy. THR research remains disproportionately concentrated in high-income countries and reflects a clear divergence between public and private research agendas. More research is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts, affordability, and real-world effectiveness of THR products using rigorous and standardized methodologies in diverse settings. Strengthening the evidence base in LMICs will be essential for developing affordable, accessible, and acceptable THR strategies tailored to local needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Medicine and Public Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101117
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding research gaps and priorities for tobacco harm reduction in low-income and middle-income countries

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Derek Yach, Gülay Öke, Adriana Curado et al.
7 citations
Ethics Medicine and Public Health
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
8.15
article

Understanding research gaps and priorities for tobacco harm reduction in low-income and middle-income countries

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Derek Yach, Gülay Öke, Adriana Curado, Sahan Lungu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Tobacco use is among the leading preventable causes of premature death worldwide, with disproportionate effects in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global tobacco control efforts have shown inconsistent results, highlighting the need for innovative approaches, such as tobacco harm reduction (THR), to complement existing strategies. We aimed to identify gaps in THR research in the global and LMIC contexts. We conducted a bibliometric review, using Scopus, to identify articles addressing THR published from January 2014 to August 2024. Research output was categorized by product type, geographical focus, volume of research output, and funding sources. A narrative synthesis was performed to outline research gaps and propose a strategic research agenda. THR research was dominated by e-cigarettes, primarily from high-income countries. Citations per 1 million smokers were highest in New Zealand (1,128.0), United Kingdom (634.3), United States (466.4), Australia (432.1), Switzerland (177.1), and South Korea (132.9). By contrast, rates were very low across Asia, Africa, and South America (range 1.8–53.5). Over the study period, research output increased only for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products. Publicly funded research tended to focus on public health concerns, while private-sector research focused on product safety and efficacy. THR research remains disproportionately concentrated in high-income countries and reflects a clear divergence between public and private research agendas. More research is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts, affordability, and real-world effectiveness of THR products using rigorous and standardized methodologies in diverse settings. Strengthening the evidence base in LMICs will be essential for developing affordable, accessible, and acceptable THR strategies tailored to local needs.

Ethics Medicine and Public HealthVol. 33
University of Malawi (MW), Global Health Strategies (United States) (US), Health Strat (Kenya) (KE), University of Global Health Equity (RW), Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, University of Glasgow (GB)
University of Otago, Wellcome Trust, Australian Government, International Development Research Centre, Ministry of Health, New Zealand, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Medical Research Council, Health Research Council of New Zealand
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
8.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.