Wide Binary Orbits Are Preferentially Aligned with the Orbits of Small Planets, but Probably Not Hot Jupiters

Abstract Studying the relative orientations of the orbits of exoplanets and wide-orbiting binary companions (semimajor axis greater than 100 au) can shed light on how planets form and evolve in binary systems. Previous observations by multiple groups discovered a possible alignment between the orbits of visual binaries and the exoplanets that reside in them. In this study, using data from Gaia DR3 and TESS, we confirm the existence of an alignment between the orbits of small planets ( R < 6 R ⊕ ) and binary systems with semimajor axes below 700 au ( p = 10 −6 ). However, we find no statistical evidence for alignment between planet and binary orbits for binary semimajor axes greater than 700 au and no evidence for alignment of large, closely orbiting planets (mostly hot Jupiters) and binaries at any separation. The lack of orbital alignment between our large-planet sample and their binary companions appears significantly different from our small-planet sample, even taking into account selection effects. Therefore, we conclude that any alignment between wide binaries and our sample of large planets (predominantly hot Jupiters) is probably not as strong as what we observe for small planets in binaries with semimajor axes less than 700 au. The difference in the alignment distribution of hot Jupiters and smaller planets may be attributed to the unique evolutionary mechanisms occurring in systems that form hot Jupiters, including potentially destabilizing secular resonances that initiate as the protoplanetary disk dissipates and high-eccentricity migration occurring after the disk is gone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/adc933
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wide Binary Orbits Are Preferentially Aligned with the Orbits of Small Planets, but Probably Not Hot Jupiters

Éric Girardin, Thiam-Guan Tan, A. Panahi, Justin M. Wittrock et al.
13 citations
The Astronomical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
15.01
article

Wide Binary Orbits Are Preferentially Aligned with the Orbits of Small Planets, but Probably Not Hot Jupiters

Éric Girardin, Thiam-Guan Tan, A. Panahi, Justin M. Wittrock, Gavin Wang, F. J. Pozuelos, F. Murgas, Juliette Becker, Phil Evans, Malena Rice, Howard M. Relles, Karen A. Collins, Chris Stockdale, S. Zucker, Pablo Lewin, Richard P. Schwarz, Andrew Vanderburg, V. Bozza, Marshall C. Johnson, Kevin I. Collins, Eric L. N. Jensen, Paul Benni, William C. Waalkes, David Baker, Dennis M. Conti, A. Binnenfeld, Logan Pearce, Don J. Radford, Joao Gregorio, T. Mazeh, Adam L. Kraus, Allyson Bieryla, Fabian Rodriguez Frustaglia, S. Christian, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Gregor Srdoč
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Studying the relative orientations of the orbits of exoplanets and wide-orbiting binary companions (semimajor axis greater than 100 au) can shed light on how planets form and evolve in binary systems. Previous observations by multiple groups discovered a possible alignment between the orbits of visual binaries and the exoplanets that reside in them. In this study, using data from Gaia DR3 and TESS, we confirm the existence of an alignment between the orbits of small planets ( R < 6 R ⊕ ) and binary systems with semimajor axes below 700 au ( p = 10 −6 ). However, we find no statistical evidence for alignment between planet and binary orbits for binary semimajor axes greater than 700 au and no evidence for alignment of large, closely orbiting planets (mostly hot Jupiters) and binaries at any separation. The lack of orbital alignment between our large-planet sample and their binary companions appears significantly different from our small-planet sample, even taking into account selection effects. Therefore, we conclude that any alignment between wide binaries and our sample of large planets (predominantly hot Jupiters) is probably not as strong as what we observe for small planets in binaries with semimajor axes less than 700 au. The difference in the alignment distribution of hot Jupiters and smaller planets may be attributed to the unique evolutionary mechanisms occurring in systems that form hot Jupiters, including potentially destabilizing secular resonances that initiate as the protoplanetary disk dissipates and high-eccentricity migration occurring after the disk is gone.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 169(6)
Dartmouth College (US), Swarthmore College (US), Austin College (US), University of Salerno (IT), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Arizona (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Kansas (US), University of Liège (BE), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), George Mason University (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), American Association of Variable Star Observers (US), Acton Institute (US), Yale University (US), Global Social Observatory (CH), Perth Exoplanet Survey Telescope Observatory (AU), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli (IT), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (ES), Universidade Politécnica de Portalegre (PT), Ellinbank Observatory (AU), The Ohio State University (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
15.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.