Contemporary Psychiatric Practices: Normalisation and Discipline in Social Context

This paper examines contemporary psychiatric practices as mechanisms of normalisation and discipline within social and cultural contexts. It explores how psychiatry not only diagnoses and treats mental illness but also establishes norms of mental health and acceptable behaviour. The increasing medicalisation of emotions, the dominance of psychopharmaceuticals, and the widespread adoption of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) demonstrate psychiatry’s role in shaping subjectivity and self-regulation. Drawing on the works of Michel Foucault, Nikolas Rose, and Peter Conrad, this paper critically assesses the ways in which psychiatric interventions function as tools of biopolitical governance. The discussion also highlights how neoliberal ideologies inculcate notions of individual responsibility for mental well-being, often at the expense of addressing structural and socio-economic determinants of distress. By analysing psychiatric discourse within the broader framework of power and control, this paper seeks to contribute to a critical understanding of mental health practices in contemporary society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meadow International Journal of Advancements in Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62060/mjamr.v10i1(may).188
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary Psychiatric Practices: Normalisation and Discipline in Social Context

Niyas S.M.
Meadow International Journal of Advancements in Multidisciplinary Research
Mental Health and Psychiatry
article

Contemporary Psychiatric Practices: Normalisation and Discipline in Social Context

Niyas S.M.
article en

Abstract

This paper examines contemporary psychiatric practices as mechanisms of normalisation and discipline within social and cultural contexts. It explores how psychiatry not only diagnoses and treats mental illness but also establishes norms of mental health and acceptable behaviour. The increasing medicalisation of emotions, the dominance of psychopharmaceuticals, and the widespread adoption of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) demonstrate psychiatry’s role in shaping subjectivity and self-regulation. Drawing on the works of Michel Foucault, Nikolas Rose, and Peter Conrad, this paper critically assesses the ways in which psychiatric interventions function as tools of biopolitical governance. The discussion also highlights how neoliberal ideologies inculcate notions of individual responsibility for mental well-being, often at the expense of addressing structural and socio-economic determinants of distress. By analysing psychiatric discourse within the broader framework of power and control, this paper seeks to contribute to a critical understanding of mental health practices in contemporary society.

Meadow International Journal of Advancements in Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 10(1(May))
Department of Biotechnology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contemporary Psychiatric Practices: Normalisation and Discipline in Social Context — Niyas S.M. · Meadow International Journal of Advancements in Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS