The Response Bias Scale and Response Bias Scale-19 of the MMPI-2-RF: Cross Validation and Comparison in an Active-Duty Neuropsychological Sample

Clinical implications suggest differences in PVT detection when assessing response invalidity. Important moderator findings suggest rank does not influence response style. Inconsistency with previous literature suggests importance of context dependent testing (e.g., post-deployment, fitness for duty vs forensic/outpatient settings). Recommendations for future use in Active-Duty populations are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf034
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Response Bias Scale and Response Bias Scale-19 of the MMPI-2-RF: Cross Validation and Comparison in an Active-Duty Neuropsychological Sample

Brandy Piña‐Watson, Paul B. Ingram, Luke Childers, A. Schmidt
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

The Response Bias Scale and Response Bias Scale-19 of the MMPI-2-RF: Cross Validation and Comparison in an Active-Duty Neuropsychological Sample

Brandy Piña‐Watson, Paul B. Ingram, Luke Childers, A. Schmidt
article en

Abstract

Clinical implications suggest differences in PVT detection when assessing response invalidity. Important moderator findings suggest rank does not influence response style. Inconsistency with previous literature suggests importance of context dependent testing (e.g., post-deployment, fitness for duty vs forensic/outpatient settings). Recommendations for future use in Active-Duty populations are provided.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(6)
Texas Tech University (US), VA Eastern Kansas Health Care System (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.