Legal consciousness and experiences of minority parents with court cases on children in the Netherlands

Abstract Court cases on children can be particularly intense and sometimes intrusive encounters with the state for the families involved. This article focusses on the experiences of minority families with court cases on their children in the Netherlands. I analyse how parents from religious, cultural or ethnic minorities experience and understand court cases on their children, view their position vis-à-vis state actors and how the experiences of family members with state actors such as child protection workers inform their legal consciousness and (lack of) trust in the state. I show how parents and other family members can have different, sometimes even opposing views of the different state actors and institutions they interact with. This article contributes to current debates in studies of legal consciousness and anthropology of the state on the state as a collection of institutions rather than a single actor by demonstrating how the involvement of different state actors can create space for families to act strategically.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Anthropology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2024.080203
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal consciousness and experiences of minority parents with court cases on children in the Netherlands

Iris Sportel
Journal of Legal Anthropology
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Legal consciousness and experiences of minority parents with court cases on children in the Netherlands

Iris Sportel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Court cases on children can be particularly intense and sometimes intrusive encounters with the state for the families involved. This article focusses on the experiences of minority families with court cases on their children in the Netherlands. I analyse how parents from religious, cultural or ethnic minorities experience and understand court cases on their children, view their position vis-à-vis state actors and how the experiences of family members with state actors such as child protection workers inform their legal consciousness and (lack of) trust in the state. I show how parents and other family members can have different, sometimes even opposing views of the different state actors and institutions they interact with. This article contributes to current debates in studies of legal consciousness and anthropology of the state on the state as a collection of institutions rather than a single actor by demonstrating how the involvement of different state actors can create space for families to act strategically.

Journal of Legal AnthropologyVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal consciousness and experiences of minority parents with court cases on children in the Netherlands — Iris Sportel · Journal of Legal Anthropology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS