Machine Learning Model Mapped Permafrost Distribution in Northeast China During 2000–2020

Permafrost, a major component of the cryosphere, is undergoing rapid degradation due to climate change, human activities, and other external disturbances, profoundly impacting ecosystems, hydroclimate, engineering geological stability, and infrastructure. In Northeast China, the thermal dynamics of the Xing’an permafrost are particularly complex, complicating the accurate assessment of its spatial extent. Many earlier mapping efforts, despite significant progress, fall short in accounting for some key local geoenvironmental factors. Thus, this study introduces a new approach that corporates four key driving factors—biotic, climatic, physiographic, and anthropogenic—by integrating multi-source datasets and in-situ observations. Four machine learning (ML) models (Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and XGBoost (XGB)) are applied to simulate permafrost distribution and probability, as well as to evaluate their performance. The results indicate that models’ accuracy, ranked from highest to lowest, is as follows: RF (Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.88, and Accuracy=0.81), XGB (0.86 and 0.77), LR (0.81 and 0.73), and SVM (0.76 and 0.66), with RF emerging as the most effective model for permafrost mapping in Northeast China. Analysis of the relationships between predictors and permafrost occurrence probability (POP) indicates that vegetation and snow cover exert non-linear effects on permafrost, while human activities significantly reduce POP. Additionally, finer soil textures and higher soil organic matter content are positively correlated with increased POP. The modeling results, combined with field survey data, also show that permafrost is more prevalent in lowlands than in uplands, confirming the symbiotic relationship between permafrost and wetlands in Northeast China. This spatial variation is influenced by local microclimates, runoff patterns, and soil thermal properties. The primary sources of model error are uncertainties in the accuracy of multi-source datasets at different scales and the reliability of observational data. Overall, ML models demonstrate great potential for mapping permafrost in Northeast China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2025.3569727
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Model Mapped Permafrost Distribution in Northeast China During 2000–2020

Lanzhi Lü, Ruixia He, Jingjing Liang, Anyuan Li et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Climate change and permafrost
1.30
article

Machine Learning Model Mapped Permafrost Distribution in Northeast China During 2000–2020

Lanzhi Lü, Ruixia He, Jingjing Liang, Anyuan Li, Xiaoying Jin, Raul‐David Șerban, Alexander N. Fedorov, Shuai Huang, Lin Yang, Yongping Wang, Xiaoying Li, Huijun Jin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Permafrost, a major component of the cryosphere, is undergoing rapid degradation due to climate change, human activities, and other external disturbances, profoundly impacting ecosystems, hydroclimate, engineering geological stability, and infrastructure. In Northeast China, the thermal dynamics of the Xing’an permafrost are particularly complex, complicating the accurate assessment of its spatial extent. Many earlier mapping efforts, despite significant progress, fall short in accounting for some key local geoenvironmental factors. Thus, this study introduces a new approach that corporates four key driving factors—biotic, climatic, physiographic, and anthropogenic—by integrating multi-source datasets and in-situ observations. Four machine learning (ML) models (Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and XGBoost (XGB)) are applied to simulate permafrost distribution and probability, as well as to evaluate their performance. The results indicate that models’ accuracy, ranked from highest to lowest, is as follows: RF (Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.88, and Accuracy=0.81), XGB (0.86 and 0.77), LR (0.81 and 0.73), and SVM (0.76 and 0.66), with RF emerging as the most effective model for permafrost mapping in Northeast China. Analysis of the relationships between predictors and permafrost occurrence probability (POP) indicates that vegetation and snow cover exert non-linear effects on permafrost, while human activities significantly reduce POP. Additionally, finer soil textures and higher soil organic matter content are positively correlated with increased POP. The modeling results, combined with field survey data, also show that permafrost is more prevalent in lowlands than in uplands, confirming the symbiotic relationship between permafrost and wetlands in Northeast China. This spatial variation is influenced by local microclimates, runoff patterns, and soil thermal properties. The primary sources of model error are uncertainties in the accuracy of multi-source datasets at different scales and the reliability of observational data. Overall, ML models demonstrate great potential for mapping permafrost in Northeast China.

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingVol. 63
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Chifeng University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources (CN), Melnikov Permafrost Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science (RU), Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Climate change and permafrost
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.