Academic Othering and the problem of I-centred philosophy of teaching

Abstract In this article, I explore the problem of homogenity—or what I refer to as Academic Othering—in education. This problem is rooted in the oppressive nature of I-centred teaching, where the Other (the student) is seen as secondary and subordinate to, as well as dependent on, the I (teacher). In this discussion, I expose the unbalanced power relations assumed in an I-centred classroom and highlight the need for alterity in education, leading me to argue for an Other-oriented approach to teaching and learning. This article discusses how Derridean deconstruction helps us confront the problem of Academic Othering and how ‘friendship informed by Différance’ may, following Sinha, provide solutions to the limitations of a teacher-centred paradigm of education. Discourse on alterity and the Other, as well as the role that the Derridean concepts of hospitality, justice, and friendship play in eliminating the traces of violence as the root cause of Academic Othering, are necessary in answering these problems. Towards the end of the article, I situate Academic Othering in the context of what Biesta calls the ‘learnification of education’, which Todd also refers to as instrumentalism in education. A reflexive account of my teaching experience frames my arguments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf031
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic Othering and the problem of I-centred philosophy of teaching

Percival Paras
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Academic Othering and the problem of I-centred philosophy of teaching

Percival Paras
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I explore the problem of homogenity—or what I refer to as Academic Othering—in education. This problem is rooted in the oppressive nature of I-centred teaching, where the Other (the student) is seen as secondary and subordinate to, as well as dependent on, the I (teacher). In this discussion, I expose the unbalanced power relations assumed in an I-centred classroom and highlight the need for alterity in education, leading me to argue for an Other-oriented approach to teaching and learning. This article discusses how Derridean deconstruction helps us confront the problem of Academic Othering and how ‘friendship informed by Différance’ may, following Sinha, provide solutions to the limitations of a teacher-centred paradigm of education. Discourse on alterity and the Other, as well as the role that the Derridean concepts of hospitality, justice, and friendship play in eliminating the traces of violence as the root cause of Academic Othering, are necessary in answering these problems. Towards the end of the article, I situate Academic Othering in the context of what Biesta calls the ‘learnification of education’, which Todd also refers to as instrumentalism in education. A reflexive account of my teaching experience frames my arguments.

Journal of Philosophy of EducationVol. 60(1-2)
Far Eastern University (TH), Far Eastern University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.