Seven Deadly Sins in Hypertension Management: In-Depth Analysis of the Errors on a Journey from Riva-Rocci to Myocardial Fibrosis

Abstract Medicine is perhaps the only science that values knowledge of the most recent scientific publications more than its history over time. Medical epistemology shows that some mistakes and successes are so close that we often do not readily differentiate between them. The production of medical knowledge makes us understand that knowledge is transitory and theories need to be revalidated, rectified, or polished, if not destroyed and built again on other bases; paradigms that are renewed move science. With this critical view, it was necessary to access how much knowledge about arterial hypertension has been built over the last 130 years, since the measurement of blood pressure began to be widespread and become routine in medical practice until the present day. This critical review was focused on errors in the interpretation of acquired knowledge, seven of which have been identified, deeply discussed, and condemned as sins due to the delay in being recognized, thus allowing the lives of people with this cardiovascular pathology to be shortened.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240811i
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seven Deadly Sins in Hypertension Management: In-Depth Analysis of the Errors on a Journey from Riva-Rocci to Myocardial Fibrosis

Fernanda Marciano Consolim‐Colombo, José Francisco Kerr Saraiva, Heitor Moreno, Cláudio Pinho
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Seven Deadly Sins in Hypertension Management: In-Depth Analysis of the Errors on a Journey from Riva-Rocci to Myocardial Fibrosis

Fernanda Marciano Consolim‐Colombo, José Francisco Kerr Saraiva, Heitor Moreno, Cláudio Pinho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Medicine is perhaps the only science that values knowledge of the most recent scientific publications more than its history over time. Medical epistemology shows that some mistakes and successes are so close that we often do not readily differentiate between them. The production of medical knowledge makes us understand that knowledge is transitory and theories need to be revalidated, rectified, or polished, if not destroyed and built again on other bases; paradigms that are renewed move science. With this critical view, it was necessary to access how much knowledge about arterial hypertension has been built over the last 130 years, since the measurement of blood pressure began to be widespread and become routine in medical practice until the present day. This critical review was focused on errors in the interpretation of acquired knowledge, seven of which have been identified, deeply discussed, and condemned as sins due to the delay in being recognized, thus allowing the lives of people with this cardiovascular pathology to be shortened.

Arquivos Brasileiros de CardiologiaVol. 122(3)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Brasil (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.