Elección de la Mejor Decisión de Inversión en San Luis Potosí Mediante Modelos Multicriterio

OBJECTIVE: To choose the best option among five, under 10 decision criteria, to make an investment in the city of San Luis Potosí using four multi-criteria decision models. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The weighting of the weights of the decision criteria has been carried out with Saaty's Hierarchical Prioritization Analysis and the multi-criteria decision models applied have been Moora, Topsis, Electre and Smart, which were used to classify the five decision options and see which of them is the best. RESULTS: The models did not agree regarding the best decision, since the first two give the investment in García Diego as the best decision, while the remaining two choose Torre Diamante. CONCLUSIONS: Even though there is no coincidence of the four models applied, it is obvious that the two best decision options are García Diego and Torre Diamante. This is an advantage that multi-criteria models provide over traditional project evaluation methods, which only consider quantitative aspects to choose the best project. With multi-criteria models, qualitative criteria are also included that consider the preferences of the decision-maker and arrive at a better decision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hitos de ciencias económico administrativas
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19136/hitos.a30n87.6337
Primary Topic
Business, Innovation, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elección de la Mejor Decisión de Inversión en San Luis Potosí Mediante Modelos Multicriterio

José Adrián Nájera Saldaña, Juan Manuel Izar Landeta, Lizbeth Angélica Zárate Camacho
Hitos de ciencias económico administrativas
Business, Innovation, and Economy
article

Elección de la Mejor Decisión de Inversión en San Luis Potosí Mediante Modelos Multicriterio

José Adrián Nájera Saldaña, Juan Manuel Izar Landeta, Lizbeth Angélica Zárate Camacho
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To choose the best option among five, under 10 decision criteria, to make an investment in the city of San Luis Potosí using four multi-criteria decision models. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The weighting of the weights of the decision criteria has been carried out with Saaty's Hierarchical Prioritization Analysis and the multi-criteria decision models applied have been Moora, Topsis, Electre and Smart, which were used to classify the five decision options and see which of them is the best. RESULTS: The models did not agree regarding the best decision, since the first two give the investment in García Diego as the best decision, while the remaining two choose Torre Diamante. CONCLUSIONS: Even though there is no coincidence of the four models applied, it is obvious that the two best decision options are García Diego and Torre Diamante. This is an advantage that multi-criteria models provide over traditional project evaluation methods, which only consider quantitative aspects to choose the best project. With multi-criteria models, qualitative criteria are also included that consider the preferences of the decision-maker and arrive at a better decision.

Hitos de ciencias económico administrativasVol. 30(87)
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Xalapa (MX), Instituto Superior Tecnológico Loja (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Business, Innovation, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.